@WestendPark benefits bandit

yo wot

iirc quantum was meant to be good for repetitive shit,not necessarily complex shit

But I really don't know

@Liam it just means that the rather than working between 1 and 0 it can work at any voltage between those

Quantum computing is super super messy

so not binary but ......

but the problem with voltages is that once you touch it it changes.

fucka u

It’ll never be practical beyond very niche computational tasks

but yeah, im looking forward to seeing where it goes. i can actually see uses for it already.

I just dont see how they get around functional error checking without inducing decoherence

Just due to the resources required to keep one operating

@Data Pagan what I was saying

fucka

cold, lots of cold and super conductors.

It’s incredibly niche

I’ll happily stay in my x86-64 comfort zone

It’s materials where the breakthroughs will be

The cooling alone makes it wildly impractical

once you have no voltage drop across something you can pretty much do w/e you want with it.

Lolfire is probs right. Its niche but who knows what the future holds for related breakthroughs

But then you’re asking for 100% efficiency

And that’s not gonna happen

i imagine you only need something like 99.99% to get a good enough measurement that you can equal it to 100% with enough rechecks.

bunch ov fucks boiisz

@Dead that doesn’t make much sense mathematically

We already have some graphene shit

what i mean is "good enough"

Loosely rounding off numbers just to get a good looking number is not good math

yeah but they dont use graphene batteries yet in mainstream shit though

so quantum computers don't use binary, but a supposition that the outcome may equal a binary state, so neither a 1 or a 0 but a computation that may equal a 1 or 0

I think that’s how creative accounting works

well, when you do work in the real world you have to make do with "good enough"

No

Maybe if you work in fast food

google measurement accuracy.

I'm just hoping for AI breakthroughs ~~so my waifu can be real~~ we can automate the majority and be forced to adjust society so that better tech actually equals better work/life balance

I think you’re just talking out of your gaping ass

were da whores @ hmu 4 thick 6 nudes xoxox

stating uncertainty is not the same as lazy math