Chump

no he hasn't lol

you think just cause you insult the holy spirit once you can't be saved?

Yes

no

Jesus said so himself

that's not what blasphemy against the holy spirit means

i've read the gospels

Boy are you guys in for a surprise once you die

in fact you're the one going to hell for that lol

if we're gonna be doofuses

I admit that I might have to chill in purgatory for a little

you think because some nine year old insults the Spirit once, he won't be saved?

But I'll get there eventually

YES

That is what the eternal sin is

how do you even believe in God if you think that He operates on this lvel

are you catholic?

since you believe in purgatory

No high church Anglican

not a single major protestant branch defines blasphemy against the Spirit the way you do

It's not protestant doe

the Spirit is Truth, and blasphemy against the Spirit is resisting the Truth

It's just english Catholicism

cut out the semantics, anglicansim doesn't do it that way either

Nah

blasphemy against the Spirit is the belief that you cannot be saved

Brb

The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that, while no sin absolutely "unforgivable", some sins represent a deliberate refusal to repent and accept the infinite mercy of God; a person committing such a sin refuses God's forgiveness, which can lead to condemnation to hell.

Can you elaborate on "insult" though?

The story of Odin sucking dick is a false story forged by a (((faggot))) who claimed Jesus had sex with his apostles when no one was watching.
There is no story in any credible literature that suggest Odin sucking dick.

Hold the phone.

Salvation

https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/gospel-topics/salvation

@Monty great name & movie BTW. My name is also based in Monty Python lore.

My name is not based on monty python but the pfp is

Fair enough

I mean to go back on what I missed, ofc insulting god isn't the best idea

But if you're indifferent you can be forgotten

Forgotten however isn't the same as accepted, in the sense that only those who do good works are accepted

@moira justify morality without a higher unconditionally non dependent being which dictates and conveys to us what is moral, and what laws we ought to conduct our lives around

he can't. he argues some sort of animal morality, where the survival of your own species is the ultimate end-goal. he cannot argue why we should have this as our end goal