Message from @Colonel Sanders™
Discord ID: 539194629745016842
one of those is less efficient but profit isn't a concept
hmmm I wonder what dems want in exchange
like if they wanna negotiate, they want something
I see Pocahontas is in the thumbnail.
Good Pocahontas.
oof
Elizabeth Warren a fat L for MA
you said the rise of automation eliminates jobs right
I believed the same thing a few years ago
but it really doesn't
if you look back in time, industrial revolution for example, people were saying jobs would be gone and that a lot of people would be unemployed and people would be doing nothing
exactly how people say it now, but look what happened
That’s different though
People still needed to work the machines
In the scenario I’m talking automation removes the majority of jobs
Like high majority
people will still be needed to make the make the machines, check if theyre working properly, repair them
yes
But in the IR the machines were run by people
It was probably 10 people to a machine but now
It would be 1 to 100
Maybe less
But you get the point
Hello
Lol
lmao, where'd you find that?
You should install a Ben garrison political cartoon bot
Yeah he draws some good shit
<:pepegun:475764936656551936> <:FAKENEWS:475769593923895306>
<:Maga_hat:475771334983417877>
<:Trump:475766890447372299>
Lol
@wahx there is supply and demand everywhere
They won’t become monopolies however , and will be much more efficient
Less shortages and less crime
Parallel bridges above, tunnels below for competition
Economizing- Say three paths: road 1 = (line A,B) , road 2 = (line A,B)+distance 50 north, road 3 = (line A,B)-distance 50 south. Say road 1 costs $50, road 2 costs $35, and road 3 costs $20, the driver could economize by picking the road at that suits them best in relation to time/money. Currently drivers have no incentive to economize because roads are completely subsidized, so they tend to take the shortest route every time which leads to congestion.
Substitutes the cost of the road would still have to be less than airfare to compete with that substitute. So there would be no monopoly in that regard, also, perhaps in a free market with private roads, passenger trains would once again be competitive in the market. Currently with subsidized roads there is no reason to compete in this sector.