Leo (BillNyeLand)

Discord ID: 271758547702775809


2,357 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/24 | Next

2019-01-01 00:38:35 UTC [Centipede Central #general]  

Hello

2019-01-01 16:45:43 UTC [Centipede Central #general]  

Hi guys

2019-01-01 16:45:45 UTC [Centipede Central #general]  

Would you mind taking this survey? Itโ€™s about 5-10 minutes and it would really help me in my school research project
https://goo.gl/forms/cftFhR78LVM8vNJs2

2019-01-01 20:14:04 UTC [Centipede Central #general]  

โ“

2019-01-01 20:30:42 UTC [Centipede Central #general]  

I arrived so as to share this survey with trump supporters , who are lacking in representation

2019-01-01 23:00:58 UTC [Centipede Central #general]  

Thank you guys for taking this survey

2019-01-01 23:39:44 UTC [Centipede Central #general]  

Wait what the is going on

2019-01-02 01:06:01 UTC [Centipede Central #general]  

Iโ€™m going to pretend Iโ€™m a political expert and say that Trump is a reaction to what people have come to see as the status quo that needs to go, which will end as soon as thereโ€™s a new status quo

2019-01-02 10:17:53 UTC [Centipede Central #general]  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/432587768682643480/529966556071985162/image0.png

2019-01-02 16:06:04 UTC [Centipede Central #general]  

Ok bye

Hello

Happy new year

There are good and bad parts to it

Encouraging women to do things like explore STEM careers is good

Screaming rape about being arrested or accusing men falsely of sexual assault is not

Do you mean the modern feminist movement, or all feminist/womenโ€™s rights movements since the creation of civilization?

or something else

Women should be property again?

I mean, I was referring to encouraging women to learn the stuff and apply it, not simply apply if they werenโ€™t capable. Disrupting work culture is likely not as much of an issue as the natural talent companies miss out on because of the relative lack of female participation in those fields; you can imagine the cost to society if someone like Marie Curie had decided or been forced not to participate in STEM careers. That Marie Curie had a loving husband also contradicts your statement (although maybe this is what you mean by superhuman?). I donโ€™t support shoving women into STEM jobs until itโ€™s perfectly half-and-half; Iโ€™m saying that itโ€™s beneficial to make sure that naturally talented women do get their opportunity to try out these fields without feeling unfairly discouraged on account of their gender.
And while I would like to see your data on how bad women are at negotiating salaries, that problem is separate from the first ones. Either way, the problem is not to take power away from women, the inevitable result of which is to further reduce their economic bargaining power. After all, the modern feminist movement (the non-crazy-SJW-part) does promote things like equal pay for equal work that would address problems like that.

Sorry for sounding like a preteen libtard.

There are many women who go into those fields; however, I think thereโ€™s still some societal attitudes (gender roles and all) that may discourage other women from exploring them. And women donโ€™t really have a reproductive duty more than adults / parents in general have a family duty. It takes two, after all.
For your second part, you seem to contradict yourself - you say that women are bad at negotiating salaries and ultimately end up working for less than they deserve (which would mean they do deserve higher pay based on the work they do), but also that men get paid more simply because they work harder and better than women do (implying that women are being paid what they deserve). Which is it?
Lastly, i canโ€™t help but notice that you cite traditional gender roles as support for traditional gender roles, in that the societal trend of keeping women at home (who would possibly be better off doing other things) causes women to work less, which you interpret as a sign that women naturally belong at home. In addition, I could create the hypothetical counterpoint of saying that if wives had *husbands* at home, then *they* could be the ones to work longer and harder at their jobs. Either one is just a reflection of whatever happens to be the gender employment ratio, not any underlying biological differences.

Isnโ€™t it automatic

I should probably get that changed

So hey

Are one or both of you American adults who would be willing to take a 5-10 minute survey?

True. The question is, are those causes or effects.

Primary elections

Thanks

I would also not want a woman who is 8 months pregnant to have to go work

Do you support parental leave

Also, thatโ€™s not what I am trying to pull - Iโ€™m saying that women are somewhat more disproportionately excluded from high-level jobs than the sheer talent differential and work ethic provides for

would you want your employer to give your family parental leave?

Thatโ€™s 100% men

I would disagree that itโ€™s very rare

Angela Merkel and Theresa May deserve at least some credit, I think

Although they are different types of jobs

Whatโ€™s your opinion on Thatcher

My opinion is that there are cultural biases that prevent women from achieving the same level success they could if it were absent (not that they are biologically the same at everything)

Yet there are flaws

Society would be more successful as a whole if everyone were able to achieve their potential without being impeded by cultural biases

I have to thank you for actually taking the time to not call me a โ€œsubhuman redneckโ€ and leave like some people in another server I was in

You should only destroy traditional instituons if it helps society, and even then with great caution

like destroying slavery

Thatโ€™s wrong

There should always be a good reason for doing something

Although I donโ€™t feel the desire to hate tradition in modernism

Thereโ€™s a long jump from anti-racists to neo-marxist

Iโ€™m an anti-racist but definitely not a neo-Marxist

If you define anti-racism as being against racism?

Thatโ€™s what you define it as?

Or thatโ€™s what you say it is?

I strongly doubt that

Even though that was an effort beyond simply opposing racism, it still got nowhere near to attempting to dethrone whites from power

Thereโ€™s really no good solution at this point

Encourage?

Seems more like grudgingly accepted, followed by holding-nose-closed tolerance

I assume you mean that those academics and politicians aim to dethrone the white race?

Thatโ€™s incredibly not a good idea

Violation of rights

Yet minorities in Europe are still that - a minority

Itโ€™s mostly white governments who pass these laws

But still, I oppose those

Those are articles advocating having fewer children

Look mixed

If you read the last article, it turns into a proponent of birth control and abortion access to the people of Niger

Based on my quick read

Aid to Africa is important, which would likely need to include such things to prevent an overpopulation crisis

Hi

Hey wait

@delet me whatโ€™s your opinion on Donald trump?

Iโ€™d say it depends on how voters react to the next two years

Also how do I get my role changed?

Iโ€™m not an sjw but that offends me less than the its ok to be white posters

Wgat

I would say that depends highly on your definition of American

Electoral college?

I donโ€™t really have a strong opinion on it tbh

Competition is best when there are few monopolies or oligopolies. Regulatory barriers to entry into some fields are too high in my opinion, which should be fixed, but conversely regulations / tax collections on the big businesses in those fields is often lacking , which only exacerbates the problem

Gilded age

There were several monopolistic organizations in major industries

Oh yeah

I did research on Rockefeller once

He did all sorts of questionable things to secure his monopoly

Heโ€™s get his monopoly to boycott any railroad that served his competitors, since losing his business would destroy the railroad

Heโ€™d buy all of the pipeline networks surrounding competitorsโ€™ oil refineries so they couldnโ€™t ship in new oil

Heโ€™d even buy every single piece of land around a competitorโ€™s refinery so they couldnโ€™t build their own pipelines out

He just had that much money

But he also did plenty of good stuff with the money

Like, his son basically built our town

2,357 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/24 | Next