Message from @chad
Discord ID: 540792725662990346
It’s a fact that men are stronger than woman. Being born a man means you are born into the physically stronger sex
Both men and women have privileges, it doesn’t have to be either or
Women have certain privileges, men have certain privileges
And before anyone says “women have more privileges than men”, that is debatable but you may be right, but that is not what the poll was originally asking
right on
Right on?
What you have described are not privileges, but freedoms offset with responsibility.
chad is right. dont argue with him
What kind of retard are you
forget it, let me continue
i'm not a retard because we disagree. simmer down
your mansplaning is scaring me
A man is born to be stronger than women, and is also born to do the bulk of the physical labor, and to defend his people in war.
yes
and i should stay home and get supported
silence, I am not responding to you
A privilege is defined by being unearned, and by not being paired with responsibility
@chad What privileges do you think men have, under this definintion?
That men are stronger biologically
That is offset by responsibility like I said
Women*
You can't really think that being biologically stronger is a real privilege with no strings attached
Men and women have nowhere near equal physical responsibilities or expectations
It’s a privilege to fight and die for your country in times of war
lmao
Lol u hate america? Fucking commie traitor. Move to Venezuela if you hate America so much
you've been brainwashed if you think that
Let me pull out the old “Smack down a libtard” card by deferring to I V L I V S.
(Just kidding but this is what trump supporters say to me if I don’t agree with their world view)
ok gonna go to sleep gn
It is honorable and can be rewarding for a man to serve militarily, but just as often the man is destroyed
gn
Of course it isn’t
Firstly there never has been a real tax rate over 45%
Secondly if they were to actually@implement the real tax rate around 70% by closing loopholes etc
The economy would take a huge downturn
Thirdly it deters investment anyways
And lastly it will also come with increased spending, since the rich who are taxed 70% will avoid most of the taxation, AOC will need more funds to pay for her shit so she’ll raise taxes on everyone.
So the burden goes back to the poor once again
That rebuttal, among many other problems, claims two contradictory things: that the rich paying their full share would cause a huge economic collapse, and that the rich aren’t ever going to pay their full share.