Tomorrow will be rough

It’s my macro economy final

;-;

But Thursday will be fine. It’s public speaking

Welcome to the club, Sammy

@Men Are Human I have very little assets, but lot of debts. This is another reason why I am trying to divorce eventually.

Economic divorce sounds...rather not the intended purpose of the thing

@asparkofpyrokravte you are right. It isn't. I realized that my freedom is more important than money

My mess(marriage) is relatable to a north korean gulag

You guys notice the guardian has one article praising men

And the other says

Just pay them less

And pay women more

Can you link the article mate?

Yeah

So they deleted the article

But there’s was in a quote on it

“Why not just pay women more, and men less?”

I had it when I was making a photoshop for misandry done by feminists

Valenti is some sort of self-parody

Things that seem patently ridiculous to implement, such as the Duluth model, actually do end up getting put through though... It's sad the state the world is.

Messing with businesses, such as paying women more for the same job, probably would meet a lot of blowback from those businesses, and certain powerful rich people. So honestly, I hope they do it just for the reaction from them.

Would give the MRM and anti-feminist movements a hell of a popularity boost

Also since if business where forced to pay women more there would be a lot of women who would end up out of work

Some yes, but due to equality laws they can't not hire them based on their gender either

It’s not rejecting them because they are women tho, is rejecting them so they can save money

Lol

When cutting costs the women would go first because men are just cheaper

That's not an acceptable argument for women who work on construction sites and can't lift as much, so I dint think they'd allow it for that, as not hiring the women and hiring men instead would save money

Well I used to do very labor heavy jobs, not construction, grounds keeping, so I did a lot of tree removals and things, so I don’t think that is an issue since there was one guy who was even smaller then me

It’s less strength and more endurance, so women can do it, they just don’t want too most the time

Dont get me wrong, I'm not saying women *can't* be capable of doing such things, only that a lot aren't (men too, only they aren't forced to hire them with quotas). If a woman with the right qualifications (safety I assume, bricklaying etc) comes along, wants it but clearly can only do half of what the men cause she has no muscle mass, are they allowed to refuse her for that or could she claim sex discrimination? perhaps I'm wrong but I was under the impression she could sue them.

I know it can come across that way but I have seen women go ask for help from the boys and I’ve kind of just looked at them like “you fucking serious, it’s not that big and only needs to go across the room”

As a women doesn’t want to build the strength to do the job she shouldn’t do the job

If she is fired for not doing the job then she has nothing to complain about

What if she claims that women aren't as physically strong as men therefore it is sex discrimination?

Then she is wrong, she should be able to lift a certain weight, then by law is something is too heavy you need tools on site to aid with lifting

I'll have to do a bit of research tbh, I'm thinking I can find a case or two where such a thing has happened, but what the ruling is I am not sure.

I agree that she's wrong but what courts decide in an issue like that is another matter

This is why there is no excuse for women not being in lower paid labour jobs like garbage collection, it’s hard work but anyone can do it if they put in the effort

Hardest day of work I ever did was spending 8 hours removing duck weed from a pond with a pitchfork, everyone came into work the next day completely fucked in the back xD