https://www.spectator.com.au/author/corrine-barracloughexample-com/

If you can't see an article because of the article limit, just put it into www.archive.is

@PM_ME_UR_PC_SPECS I'd say discrimination against men is based on misandry.

Evil finals.

I’d say discrimination against men is based on double standards

On a happier note, my little brothers graduation from University is on Monday, I need to find some new clothes so I don’t smell like a farm xD

Congrats 🙂

He is the keeper of the family brain cell xD

Lol

I can’t wait to graduate.

College is nasty

I’ve finished 3 of my 5 finals

Yas, so close! I believe!

Tomorrow will be rough

It’s my macro economy final

;-;

But Thursday will be fine. It’s public speaking

Welcome to the club, Sammy

@Men Are Human I have very little assets, but lot of debts. This is another reason why I am trying to divorce eventually.

Economic divorce sounds...rather not the intended purpose of the thing

@asparkofpyrokravte you are right. It isn't. I realized that my freedom is more important than money

My mess(marriage) is relatable to a north korean gulag

You guys notice the guardian has one article praising men

And the other says

Just pay them less

And pay women more

Can you link the article mate?

Yeah

So they deleted the article

But there’s was in a quote on it

“Why not just pay women more, and men less?”

I had it when I was making a photoshop for misandry done by feminists

Valenti is some sort of self-parody

Things that seem patently ridiculous to implement, such as the Duluth model, actually do end up getting put through though... It's sad the state the world is.

Messing with businesses, such as paying women more for the same job, probably would meet a lot of blowback from those businesses, and certain powerful rich people. So honestly, I hope they do it just for the reaction from them.

Would give the MRM and anti-feminist movements a hell of a popularity boost

Also since if business where forced to pay women more there would be a lot of women who would end up out of work

Some yes, but due to equality laws they can't not hire them based on their gender either

It’s not rejecting them because they are women tho, is rejecting them so they can save money

Lol