Message from @Huff

Discord ID: 523932594719555588


2018-12-16 18:38:26 UTC  

It was the Soviets who decided to fuck everyone over with their economic policy mate, not little maa and paw farms on the country side 😂 @Xinyue

2018-12-16 18:38:41 UTC  

collective ownership worked just fine during the USSR post Stalin, absolutely no famines of any kind

2018-12-16 18:38:42 UTC  

it's the same thuggish mentality that stalin had, just take it by force

2018-12-16 18:38:43 UTC  

@Stern Then you would have to prove that industralization couldn't wait for a year or two.

2018-12-16 18:39:00 UTC  

ussr collapsed post stalin

2018-12-16 18:39:00 UTC  

Sovkhoz and Kolkhoz did provide foodstuffs just fine

2018-12-16 18:39:01 UTC  

@Xinyue absolutely no food shortages amiright?

2018-12-16 18:39:07 UTC  

zero famines, yes

2018-12-16 18:39:10 UTC  
2018-12-16 18:39:31 UTC  

Well will you adress it or not?

2018-12-16 18:39:31 UTC  

no food shortages, ever after the holodomor? right? @Xinyue

2018-12-16 18:39:56 UTC  

no murders post murder

2018-12-16 18:40:04 UTC  

I don't know of any major food shortages in 1960s, 1970s for example. I do know that foodstamps are common in US though @AdorableStormtrooper

2018-12-16 18:40:26 UTC  

what does that mean?

2018-12-16 18:40:27 UTC  

@Aki do you deny that agrarian economies can't transport and produce food as well as industrial nations (along with not being able to produce military goods necessary to defend a country in time of war)

2018-12-16 18:40:30 UTC  

Foodstamps are free food

2018-12-16 18:40:40 UTC  

That is not what I asked you for mate.

2018-12-16 18:40:42 UTC  

food stamps shouldn't be common

2018-12-16 18:40:56 UTC  

@Aki ok

2018-12-16 18:40:59 UTC  

but do you deny it

2018-12-16 18:41:04 UTC  

What do food stamps have to do with food shortage

2018-12-16 18:41:12 UTC  

Its the ability to provide people

2018-12-16 18:41:14 UTC  

With food

2018-12-16 18:41:20 UTC  

Even when they can't pay for it

2018-12-16 18:41:30 UTC  

That is the opposite

2018-12-16 18:41:32 UTC  

No?

2018-12-16 18:41:44 UTC  

No I don't but it is in a way outside of the point.

2018-12-16 18:41:51 UTC  

It's leading to the point

2018-12-16 18:42:02 UTC  

ok give me the point then

2018-12-16 18:42:06 UTC  

@Xinyue does everyone deserve food? why?

2018-12-16 18:42:08 UTC  

US economic system is inadequate at delivering food to everyone; hence why they have to create a system outside the economic system to make sure food finds it way to the people the economic system can't reach. Food rationing in general is like this, you work outside the basic economic system to make sure that people get fed. Point is, people *were* fed, clothed and housed and the public sector determined the utilisation of the productive forces. The system did reach the goals that it set out to attain.

2018-12-16 18:42:52 UTC  

That's the Wrong Goals

2018-12-16 18:42:57 UTC  

"do you deny that agrarian economies can't transport and produce food as well as industrial nations (along with not being able to produce military goods necessary to defend a country in time of war)"
since you agree with this point, it's common sense to put industrialization as an emphasis

2018-12-16 18:43:01 UTC  

Subjective opinion on your part @AdorableStormtrooper

2018-12-16 18:43:06 UTC  

But it is adequate at delivering food to everyone

2018-12-16 18:43:11 UTC  

They can still eat

2018-12-16 18:43:20 UTC  

Thats what foodstamps are for

2018-12-16 18:43:28 UTC  

because unindustrialized economies can't produce or transport anything as efficiently as industrial ones

2018-12-16 18:43:29 UTC  

Am I not understanding something

2018-12-16 18:43:39 UTC  

i reserve my right

2018-12-16 18:43:42 UTC  

@Xinyue Your entire ideology depends on this, and i don't believe in a subjective morality, so no.
That is seriously a wrong goal.