Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 533425229155008522


2019-01-11 23:12:52 UTC  

learn Imago Dei scummy pagan

2019-01-11 23:12:55 UTC  

They still didn't give you the tag, here

2019-01-11 23:13:20 UTC  

you give me a role like this but ur the mexican pagan using fraktur text like ur some aryan

2019-01-11 23:13:31 UTC  

taco odin assblasted

@The Big Oof thanks for the recommendantion of using Brave instead of Chrome, it's faster in my computer and it has some things that chrome hasn't that I find pleasing

2019-01-11 23:13:48 UTC  

Oy vey, stop being an antisemite

2019-01-11 23:14:07 UTC  

yeah, he's right genetics are meaningless to the Christian dogma, any lowly existence is considered a Christian

2019-01-11 23:14:42 UTC  

I believe the role of a King is essential. - To have a man that unites the country under his governance, that can represent the nation through it's hardships. But a King is only as noble as the causes he serves.

2019-01-11 23:15:31 UTC  

how is that different to say, a president then?

2019-01-11 23:15:44 UTC  

To the Christian dogma, life itself is vanity

2019-01-11 23:17:29 UTC  

@CronoSaturn Presidents could serve the same purpose, but most often, they're only elected for 4-5 years before they disappear from the public and a new one takes his place. A King however spends his life, devoted to his country, and the Prince would succeed his burden, one day.

A President is just some normal guy whereas a King is someone above all, someone to strive to be and a Moral guidance

2019-01-11 23:17:44 UTC  

^

2019-01-11 23:17:51 UTC  

I don't get how people fail to get simple things like the difference of it's and its

2019-01-11 23:17:52 UTC  

kings are boring

2019-01-11 23:17:58 UTC  

it's not, since you're judged based on your deeds. Life is simply a road the soul has to take

2019-01-11 23:18:31 UTC  

@Bearer Of The Curse Its pretty simple, actually.

2019-01-11 23:20:01 UTC  

a president could be elected for life but for any lifelong position theres always the concern that while they once might have been entirely devoted to their country that the devotion wanes over time. there's also no reason to believe that a prince would be equally as devoted.

2019-01-11 23:20:08 UTC  

All aspects of life serve naught, for the true existence is after death, if you ever have a chance to die for believing in God, you're supposed to embrace it

2019-01-11 23:21:22 UTC  

every religion preaches fearlessness in the face of death

2019-01-11 23:21:25 UTC  

@CronoSaturn Usually they have years of indoctrination. Of course it varies, but most successors, as those who came before them once were; tend to be humble Kings.

2019-01-11 23:22:06 UTC  

Not all, but yes, fearlessness is great for a combat religion

2019-01-11 23:22:21 UTC  

>le combat religion

2019-01-11 23:22:23 UTC  

right but history shows that not all princes were effectively groomed for rule. why take that risk?

2019-01-11 23:22:25 UTC  

That went out weird

2019-01-11 23:22:26 UTC  

atheist reveals his face

2019-01-11 23:22:59 UTC  

I have to rephrase it, shut up ailurophile

2019-01-11 23:23:24 UTC  

if ur not catholic ur opinion is useless

Because every choice of a new ruler is a risk, a new President could fuck us all, a new Dictator could fuck everything up, a Prince groomed from start is the safest choice

2019-01-11 23:23:51 UTC  

all religions are inherently assertive/violent

2019-01-11 23:23:58 UTC  

you'll never have a peaceful one

2019-01-11 23:24:05 UTC  

Bhudaism?

2019-01-11 23:24:21 UTC  

@Bird Wizard You can burn at the stake.

2019-01-11 23:24:28 UTC  

^'

2019-01-11 23:25:06 UTC  

philosophy is one of peace, in practice u get your typical human behavior

2019-01-11 23:26:14 UTC  

right, peace is not in line with nature

2019-01-11 23:26:21 UTC  

Fearlessness is great for the combat that naturally exists in a worldful of tribes with conflicting interests