learn Imago Dei scummy pagan

They still didn't give you the tag, here

you give me a role like this but ur the mexican pagan using fraktur text like ur some aryan

taco odin assblasted

@The Big Oof thanks for the recommendantion of using Brave instead of Chrome, it's faster in my computer and it has some things that chrome hasn't that I find pleasing

Oy vey, stop being an antisemite

yeah, he's right genetics are meaningless to the Christian dogma, any lowly existence is considered a Christian

I believe the role of a King is essential. - To have a man that unites the country under his governance, that can represent the nation through it's hardships. But a King is only as noble as the causes he serves.

how is that different to say, a president then?

To the Christian dogma, life itself is vanity

@CronoSaturn Presidents could serve the same purpose, but most often, they're only elected for 4-5 years before they disappear from the public and a new one takes his place. A King however spends his life, devoted to his country, and the Prince would succeed his burden, one day.

A President is just some normal guy whereas a King is someone above all, someone to strive to be and a Moral guidance

^

I don't get how people fail to get simple things like the difference of it's and its

kings are boring

it's not, since you're judged based on your deeds. Life is simply a road the soul has to take

@Bearer Of The Curse Its pretty simple, actually.

a president could be elected for life but for any lifelong position theres always the concern that while they once might have been entirely devoted to their country that the devotion wanes over time. there's also no reason to believe that a prince would be equally as devoted.

All aspects of life serve naught, for the true existence is after death, if you ever have a chance to die for believing in God, you're supposed to embrace it

every religion preaches fearlessness in the face of death

@CronoSaturn Usually they have years of indoctrination. Of course it varies, but most successors, as those who came before them once were; tend to be humble Kings.

Not all, but yes, fearlessness is great for a combat religion

>le combat religion

right but history shows that not all princes were effectively groomed for rule. why take that risk?

That went out weird

atheist reveals his face

I have to rephrase it, shut up ailurophile

if ur not catholic ur opinion is useless

Because every choice of a new ruler is a risk, a new President could fuck us all, a new Dictator could fuck everything up, a Prince groomed from start is the safest choice

And Divine Right maybe

all religions are inherently assertive/violent

you'll never have a peaceful one

Bhudaism?

@Bird Wizard You can burn at the stake.

^'

Buddism isn't peacefull at all

philosophy is one of peace, in practice u get your typical human behavior

Don't take the Western version of it, take by the Buddist burning himself up in protest

the Slaughtering of Muslims, Christians, and ((long noses))) in China/India

right, peace is not in line with nature

Fearlessness is great for the combat that naturally exists in a worldful of tribes with conflicting interests