or have them talk about what their best guesses are

and what those guesses are based on

they give estimations for a lot of things

@Nerthulas their best guesses are politically motivated. It has always been.

It is not empirical

what do you mean it's not empirical

you mean it's not certain

they have reasoning for their estimations

Have you spoken to historians? The ones you find at universities these days want black reparations.

which are based on other things

ok, some of them do

we could look at surveys of historians maybe

but

were they in the 50s?

all of them are politically selected for tenure

how much of the historical consensus has changed since the 50s?

how much of that had a good reason?

there are historians in other countries

@MARS3.0 based

Do you think a radically questioning historian would be tenured?

@gast gladly we have older history ***books***

well, have your heard of the 1619 Project from the New York Times? It's basically a failed effort to rewrite American history by some empowered black female.....

The older books were already subverted.

She said the founding of America is based on the desire to enslave blacks. She got enormous pushback from historians and university professors

subverted in what way?

eventually she concede that she was wrong

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2019/05/unauthorized-history.html

@Str3tch yeah I read the unz article on that

subverted by freemasons, reeeeeee

pretty uniform

@Medman At least give credit to the original

since blacks dont have males as a unisex races, they lack the self correcting features white have

https://youtu.be/I3j9zzgOiRU

https://youtu.be/Zd8vzIRQLLM

@gast what do you want to say about the hundred years war?

what do you want to say about these wars?

also, multiple sides survived from these wars

@Nerthulas That the foundations of the current narrative was already formed then.