Do you think a radically questioning historian would be tenured?

@gast gladly we have older history ***books***

well, have your heard of the 1619 Project from the New York Times? It's basically a failed effort to rewrite American history by some empowered black female.....

The older books were already subverted.

She said the founding of America is based on the desire to enslave blacks. She got enormous pushback from historians and university professors

subverted in what way?

eventually she concede that she was wrong

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2019/05/unauthorized-history.html

@Str3tch yeah I read the unz article on that

subverted by freemasons, reeeeeee

pretty uniform

@Medman At least give credit to the original

since blacks dont have males as a unisex races, they lack the self correcting features white have

https://youtu.be/I3j9zzgOiRU

https://youtu.be/Zd8vzIRQLLM

@gast what do you want to say about the hundred years war?

what do you want to say about these wars?

also, multiple sides survived from these wars

@Nerthulas That the foundations of the current narrative was already formed then.

Subversion is thousands of years old

the 30 years war ended in treaty, not world domination

the 100 years war ended in treaty, not capitulation

ok so who was doing the subversion and what form did it take

and why do you think they were engaging in subversion

The only reason why it took so long is people being unwilling to accept it. Wars are used to destroy the family and successive inheritances.

stay focused

who was doing the subversion

and what were they subverting

Let me show you

ok

@21ooAB its not my post u retard

@Medman very rude

stfu

Look at the deathtoll for the 30 years war

keep in mind the total population for that time

The 30 years war was the real WW1

The graph for the 100 years war is not even shown, but it is understood to have a higher death toll than the 30 years war.

why are you trusting this graph made a few years ago