Message from @Fuerchtegott
Discord ID: 688515046615023669
but
were they in the 50s?
all of them are politically selected for tenure
how much of the historical consensus has changed since the 50s?
how much of that had a good reason?
there are historians in other countries
Do you think a radically questioning historian would be tenured?
@gast gladly we have older history ***books***
well, have your heard of the 1619 Project from the New York Times? It's basically a failed effort to rewrite American history by some empowered black female.....
The older books were already subverted.
She said the founding of America is based on the desire to enslave blacks. She got enormous pushback from historians and university professors
subverted in what way?
eventually she concede that she was wrong
subverted by freemasons, reeeeeee
pretty uniform
what do you want to say about these wars?
also, multiple sides survived from these wars
@Nerthulas That the foundations of the current narrative was already formed then.
Subversion is thousands of years old
the 30 years war ended in treaty, not world domination
the 100 years war ended in treaty, not capitulation
ok so who was doing the subversion and what form did it take
and why do you think they were engaging in subversion
The only reason why it took so long is people being unwilling to accept it. Wars are used to destroy the family and successive inheritances.
stay focused
who was doing the subversion
and what were they subverting
Let me show you
ok