The physical artifacts that we have are given a context, when in reality we should assume we know nothing of physical artifacts and instead place them in a timeline that is actually verified.

what verified timeline

guys

is this 33 thing about the coronavirus something true

Well say a roman lamp is found. The dating methods are not empirical.

https://www.instagram.com/tv/B9ukfuHDL_F/?igshid=1wu4e9jm2yi3y

Its like dating a piece of art.

The entire field is full of BS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nS-blQ67HFc

ok

well

they don't say that they know for sure

would you rather they just say

the coronavirus hopefully kills a lot of people

"we don't know anything about this"

or have them talk about what their best guesses are

and what those guesses are based on

they give estimations for a lot of things

@Nerthulas their best guesses are politically motivated. It has always been.

It is not empirical

what do you mean it's not empirical

you mean it's not certain

they have reasoning for their estimations

Have you spoken to historians? The ones you find at universities these days want black reparations.

which are based on other things

ok, some of them do

we could look at surveys of historians maybe

but

were they in the 50s?

all of them are politically selected for tenure

how much of the historical consensus has changed since the 50s?

how much of that had a good reason?

there are historians in other countries

@MARS3.0 based

Do you think a radically questioning historian would be tenured?

@gast gladly we have older history ***books***

well, have your heard of the 1619 Project from the New York Times? It's basically a failed effort to rewrite American history by some empowered black female.....

The older books were already subverted.

She said the founding of America is based on the desire to enslave blacks. She got enormous pushback from historians and university professors