Message from @lmbd
Discord ID: 519148833792458752
I only do watch a couple of youtubers on it but Kelliann hubs has 28 1-2 hour videos on it she is a soldier on this .. I agree it really does not matter who it is it’s happening is the main thing at the last chance possible .. just discussing it after this guy saying it on MSM just then kinda smacked me when he sayd he believes bush’s are finished but Kennedy’s are not in politics .. as in President potential is the impression i got
I think now that Bush is gone and the Eo posted regarding release of the Jfk files and data... this will put the Kennedy name back onto a whole new series of young people's radar here in the states. There are/is another generation of the K family - but none are a Ted, Bob, or John.
Q said there’s only Q , but didn’t say he’s not JFK Jr. ...
@hitchhiker - I remember the Q&A on the chans when that Q uestion was posed.... if you can find it/pull it - feel free.
To me mate that was saying there’s no one person deserves credit over another in the Q team @hitchhiker .. agree it never answered the question atol
It is irrelevant considering what’s in play so i do see why it’s not answered properly yet but the stuff Kelliann has is crazy .. although who knows until it’s official .. there’s a lot can be disproven easy but i follow it .. no other names being mentioned that I know and all the pictures etc match up close also
Kelliann believes he’s set to come out public lol
I really haven’t gotten into watching all those vids about him ... I just think it would be the perfect end to “ the Plan “ to have JFK Jr. come out and tell how Killory tried to off him
I’m looking for that Q drop
Got enough on my plate to decode... just an old rag tag's 2 cents... would make a helluva story for sure.
She’s good Decoder mate @hitchhiker she spots lots of signs can’t talk 1-3 hours with out some evidence weather it’s all right who knows but what’s all out there is alot .. there’s a team of them on twitter who focus on nothing else than jfk jr signs .. they have left Q decoding to the anons
Also at the same time can’t forget disinformation is also necessary lol but I’m sure deep state know for sure if he died that day or not
I know it’s a huge what if ... but it would be an awesome thing if it happened to be true
I can’t find that Q drop
Look here or [there]
Its behind you
We'd like you to "look there"
I've been all over this trail since April 8 and drops 1082/1083... you should too. "AS The World Turns"
Check out @findtruthQ’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/findtruthQ/status/1069458525447958530?s=09
page 21
"child crime folders" (5)
I’m not sure mate I’m way more for than against it at this point @hitchhiker but it is down to your personal thoughts after you see everything .. there’s so much evidence and the face match ups of him and his wife .. it would be a perfect ending .. it’s that one drop saying .. we won’t believe who is speaking .. that one makes it hard for me to think it’s anyone around potus etc that we can see .. it would have to be someone declared dead etc to shock me in the way that drop described
@LowLandsPete On your drop only first page is now available.
scroll down select page nr
Please back this up
In statistics, the 68–95–99.7 rule, also known as the empirical rule, is a shorthand used to remember the percentage of values that lie within a band around the mean in a normal distribution with a width of two, four and six standard deviations, respectively; more accurately, 68.27%, 95.45% and 99.73% of the values lie within one, two and three standard deviations of the mean, respectively. In mathematical notation, these facts can be expressed as follows, where X is an observation from a normally distributed random variable, μ is the mean of the distribution, and σ is its standard deviation:
In the empirical sciences the so-called three-sigma rule of thumb expresses a conventional heuristic that nearly all values are taken to lie within three standard deviations of the mean, and thus it is empirically useful to treat 99.7% probability as near certainty.[1] The usefulness of this heuristic depends significantly on the question under consideration. In the social sciences, a result may be considered "significant" if its confidence level is of the order of a two-sigma effect (95%), while in particle physics, there is a convention of a five-sigma effect (99.99994% confidence) being required to qualify as a discovery.
in other words, its the formula for how to identify when coincidences are no longer mathematically possible.
des, check out the little thing i dropped over in research-open
Jerome Corsi files complaint against Mueller | Prosecutor | Perjury
https://www.scribd.com/document/394783704/Jerome-Corsi-files-complaint-against-Mueller
i also dropped it in here above ur long posts
In saving himself Corsi filed this ... ☝️