Message from @SirW00f
Discord ID: 519209968306749441
Check out @findtruthQ’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/findtruthQ/status/1069458525447958530?s=09
page 21
"child crime folders" (5)
I’m not sure mate I’m way more for than against it at this point @hitchhiker but it is down to your personal thoughts after you see everything .. there’s so much evidence and the face match ups of him and his wife .. it would be a perfect ending .. it’s that one drop saying .. we won’t believe who is speaking .. that one makes it hard for me to think it’s anyone around potus etc that we can see .. it would have to be someone declared dead etc to shock me in the way that drop described
@LowLandsPete On your drop only first page is now available.
scroll down select page nr
Please back this up
In statistics, the 68–95–99.7 rule, also known as the empirical rule, is a shorthand used to remember the percentage of values that lie within a band around the mean in a normal distribution with a width of two, four and six standard deviations, respectively; more accurately, 68.27%, 95.45% and 99.73% of the values lie within one, two and three standard deviations of the mean, respectively. In mathematical notation, these facts can be expressed as follows, where X is an observation from a normally distributed random variable, μ is the mean of the distribution, and σ is its standard deviation:
In the empirical sciences the so-called three-sigma rule of thumb expresses a conventional heuristic that nearly all values are taken to lie within three standard deviations of the mean, and thus it is empirically useful to treat 99.7% probability as near certainty.[1] The usefulness of this heuristic depends significantly on the question under consideration. In the social sciences, a result may be considered "significant" if its confidence level is of the order of a two-sigma effect (95%), while in particle physics, there is a convention of a five-sigma effect (99.99994% confidence) being required to qualify as a discovery.
in other words, its the formula for how to identify when coincidences are no longer mathematically possible.
des, check out the little thing i dropped over in research-open
Jerome Corsi files complaint against Mueller | Prosecutor | Perjury
https://www.scribd.com/document/394783704/Jerome-Corsi-files-complaint-against-Mueller
In saving himself Corsi filed this ... ☝️
the twitter post? checking it out now
morning @Desimated
Morning @creepyAnon
https://youtu.be/2amI5FKhoHA
Hilarious commentary if you've got the time.
Morning Patriots!!!
morning
so who's ready for 10 days of government darkness? lol i'm still fully believing this is when things will happen (arrests) , re-affirmed when @SirW00f posted this: https://twitter.com/yigsstarhouse/status/1069418338361769985
more Q
@LowLandsPete caught it, thanks!
<#419210947866132500> has been updated
Think this is about the leaker? or what we will see on the 5th?
pushing for public hearing, not classified if it becomes unclassifed
public hearings can't be leaked and disinfo'd
oh snap, that would be delicious
yeah if they make it declass, they can ask everything
expecially with that EO stating something cant be classified for specific reasons
can't be classified if to cover up treason
funny thing is ...it's obama eo
i guess he forgot to read them before he signed them