@everybodydothatdinosaur it's about wanting to maintain culture, rights, freedoms and safety while rejecting foreign dominance over our own affairs. It's about conceiving some actual self worth in this world. I'd advocate exactly the same for the africans.

The issue is the beating around the bush, now that you admit it, yes I think it's bad, but becuase they're not "your people" just for having the same race

My preference for white people is ingrained in my brain. To actively go out of my way to stop pursuing white people and instead get with other ethnicities is a needless expenditure of mental resources.

People already are forced by the current states, even in the US. Repeal the Civil Rights Laws and you will see self segregation in action.

It's becuase you want what will be more percieved power, not about actually improving society or your bloodlines, that's the issue xD

And fear of losing said power, which you hold as the higher standard, and connect to race for whatever reason

> It's becuase you want what will be more percieved power, not about actually improving society or your bloodlines, that's the issue xD

It's all of the above.

I don't care about improving society whatsoever. People need to improve themselves, not society. Society will follow as a result.

There's no way to percieve this as a powergrab, because as I said before - these are already our societies.

>Everyone would be free to make their own decisions, and not have them forced on them

https://mises.org/library/open-borders-are-assault-private-property

In a welfare state, open borders are theft.

>they're not "your people" just for having the same race
well that's some opinion you've got there. any particular reason?

I wonder who is currently forcing third worlders into western nations. I don't see ethnats doing it.

well... perhaps hostile ethnonats. zionists maybe. @Monstrous Moonshine

@ETBrooD If the whole issue is just improving your own circumstances, than you'd want to be around asians with the lowest crime rates and highest IQ by your own estimations
@Greasy They're not members of your community unless you know and interact with them, a person of any race you don't know is just as random to you as anyone else
@Monstrous Moonshine Deflecting by bringing up another irrelevant issue instead of focusing on the issue that mandatory exclusion of certain people and removing freedom of association is an inherent violation of freedom is silly. I'm sure you could just say, it's wrong to exclude people, but instead you say, well here is this other thing instead to not have to admit it

You're just anti-white *yawn*

>They're not members of your community unless you know and interact with them
Do you know what a nation even is?

It's like saying if you have never met your dad he isn't part of your family

It's just the entire matter of distance being irrelevant - the human race is commonly referred to as the global community, the neighbourhood is a community, the street is a community, and so on. Size doesn't matter for use of the word 'community'. The specific size I am referring to is the Nation. @everybodydothatdinosaur

btw feel free to continue without me

@everybodydothatdinosaur You're looking at this from your own subjective POV. Mine isn't yours. I would date some Asians, but if I had to make an uninformed choice, I'd go with a white person.

Generally speaking it's more likely that a white person has similar cultural and ideological views to my own. So for me, even the most basic statistics say I should pick white people before others, unless I've already exhausted the pool of valid mates.

How many Candace Owens exist in the black population? Not many, I can tell you that.

Candace Owens is ugly

I wouldn't date any Asians because dating for me is about finding a woman to marry, but that's just me. And I wouldnt marry an Asian.

Right, so the IQ and crime rates things, are essentially irrelevant

No they're not, because black people do have provably higher violent crime rates, and lower IQ.

Thus living around more of them, is more dangerous. Its more dangerous for Asians to live around Blacks too, and they know this. Hence why they like to segregate themselves into China Town like enclaves.

In fact, getting with a black person is almost retarded, especially considering the effect of self-segregation. Your partner will want to stick around black people.

Exceptions prove the rule and are rarely worth pursuing because of time constraints. I don't have infinite time to find a valid mate.

90% of women who have a child with a Black man never marry the father.
ooooooooooooooooof

That true?

Yes.

What a truth bomb. You should drop it more often.

I will provide source, if you would like. DM'ed it.

I think some people have me confused here. I have in-group preferences. All humans do. But my in-group of friends, neighbors, and co-workers the community I rely on is not ethnically homogeneous. We're Americans *culturally*.

Well me personally... and you can use buzzwords all you want... but my in-group of friends is racially homogenous. And I see nothing immoral with that, nor is there any good reason to change that.

And you can make all this up about black people if you want, that's genetic and biological despite no proof of it, but then you can't make the same arguments about IQ and Crime rates when it comes to excluding asians, jews or various other demographics, and so it comes down to, well that's just a made up reason

So if you had a serial killer neighbor who was white, that would be better, than a black neighbor who was productive and had working, just due to race xD

actually more serial killers are black. i have data to prove it too but youd dismiss it so who cares.

This is the problem with basing stuff on race, it's arbitrary; yes but if that individual black person is not a serial killer, and that individual white person is, who cares what the average is?