It's like saying if you have never met your dad he isn't part of your family

It's just the entire matter of distance being irrelevant - the human race is commonly referred to as the global community, the neighbourhood is a community, the street is a community, and so on. Size doesn't matter for use of the word 'community'. The specific size I am referring to is the Nation. @everybodydothatdinosaur

btw feel free to continue without me

@everybodydothatdinosaur You're looking at this from your own subjective POV. Mine isn't yours. I would date some Asians, but if I had to make an uninformed choice, I'd go with a white person.

Generally speaking it's more likely that a white person has similar cultural and ideological views to my own. So for me, even the most basic statistics say I should pick white people before others, unless I've already exhausted the pool of valid mates.

How many Candace Owens exist in the black population? Not many, I can tell you that.

Candace Owens is ugly

I wouldn't date any Asians because dating for me is about finding a woman to marry, but that's just me. And I wouldnt marry an Asian.

Right, so the IQ and crime rates things, are essentially irrelevant

No they're not, because black people do have provably higher violent crime rates, and lower IQ.

Thus living around more of them, is more dangerous. Its more dangerous for Asians to live around Blacks too, and they know this. Hence why they like to segregate themselves into China Town like enclaves.

In fact, getting with a black person is almost retarded, especially considering the effect of self-segregation. Your partner will want to stick around black people.

Exceptions prove the rule and are rarely worth pursuing because of time constraints. I don't have infinite time to find a valid mate.

90% of women who have a child with a Black man never marry the father.
ooooooooooooooooof

That true?

Yes.

What a truth bomb. You should drop it more often.

I will provide source, if you would like. DM'ed it.

I think some people have me confused here. I have in-group preferences. All humans do. But my in-group of friends, neighbors, and co-workers the community I rely on is not ethnically homogeneous. We're Americans *culturally*.

Well me personally... and you can use buzzwords all you want... but my in-group of friends is racially homogenous. And I see nothing immoral with that, nor is there any good reason to change that.

And you can make all this up about black people if you want, that's genetic and biological despite no proof of it, but then you can't make the same arguments about IQ and Crime rates when it comes to excluding asians, jews or various other demographics, and so it comes down to, well that's just a made up reason

So if you had a serial killer neighbor who was white, that would be better, than a black neighbor who was productive and had working, just due to race xD

actually more serial killers are black. i have data to prove it too but youd dismiss it so who cares.

This is the problem with basing stuff on race, it's arbitrary; yes but if that individual black person is not a serial killer, and that individual white person is, who cares what the average is?

Species and families are just as arbitrary as race, as categories, they aren’t clear endings and beginnings

dude i never said that all black people are violent or dumb..

the fact that you interpret statistical averages to mean that all black individuals must be dumb or violent kinda says more about you then it does about me

And yet you'd rather never live around any of them and only be in a white only ethnostate despite this xD

What about the intelligent non-violent black people, you exclude those because of the one's that are? Again, it's arbitrary

it also shows that you dont understand averages.

I do, my point is excluding an individual and feeling a closer association with someone you don't even know just due to race is silly

or, basically dumb

pffft you are so foolish. Well Ill say this. If Britain got nuked Id feel more upset then if Nigeria got nuked. <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

Both would make me upset like yo thats not cool. But Britain to me would be markedly more uncool.

Right, another deflection xD

That's kind of my point, it doesn't end up being logical if the issue is on the well being of the society as a whole, or about having better neighbors with a closer sense of community and so on

Its not a deflection at all.

I am telling you that yes I feel a closer association to a white stranger then a black stranger. I also feel a closer association to individuals who are in the same class as me. Combining the same race and same class, and if I can see that from appearance, makes me more likely to engage with them. However that does not mean that I would never engage with a black person in a friendly conversation. All of this seems a rather normal way to operate to me, and I see nothing immoral with it.

That's not the only point I'm making, again, the fact you'd want an ethnostate for safety or IQ, and then include a white serial killer but not a productive black person. You would think if the issue was safety or merit you'd select for these features instead of race, but it comes down to that you see people in your same race as being your community rather than, those whom you actually live around.

The thing I live in Texas, and I'd rather be around my pro-gun black and hispanic neighbors than a bunch of white Californian liberals or any assortment of Eurocucks, as I like their values and principles and ideas, rather than the fact they just, are white. I judge people as individuals, and so it's irrelevant if there is a higher statistical average, I wouldn't exclude someone because they're lumped in with another group of people but assess them as an individual. The issue is it's ultimately not about crime, IQ, values, culture etc. if you exclude people for factors not based on those reasons. At the end of the day there will be bad white people you would support and good black people you exclude, for no other reason than deciding to do it that way, for it's own end.

the white serial killer would be arrested duh for murder. so that is invalid. the arrest would separate them from the society

And yet you don't just arrest the black serial killer xD

I mean how is it invalid when we do the same thing for the black people, the arrest would seperate them from society, why do you need to exclude them as a whole xD

You just defeated your own argument