Message from @P4GY
Discord ID: 664138206714920989
how the word is used in the us generally forms a part of liberalism more broadly
Ok sooo...
I've heard that policies pushed by The Greens in Australia have actually contributed to the spread of the fires. Can someome elaborate on this?
It's California but worse.
The people protesting against controlled burns let brush and dead wood pile up until one day it hits a overfuelled, unhindered blaze.
Some have also blamed it on arson, because people want to prove that the world is on fire by setting it on fire and blaming climate change.
Even though it was their own refusal of controlled-burn forest management that allowed it to go this far on its own.
Is control-burn management actually necessary there? Over here, I have never heard of us intentionally burning forests. I assume they just get exploited for wood so well we don't really need to.
I'm not an expert nor a firefighter, but I think control-burning seems like a good idea.
I get why it's a good idea if your forests are full of dead wood and undergrowth, but ours aren't.
Australia is huge, though, so I excuse them not being able to tend to all of the forests.
I also heard that the policies enacted by the Greens stopped the tending of forests in Australia
Am I mistaken?
I know there were protests over it, people wanting to end or limit controlled burning
And I know there are less instances of controlled burning than there were
But by how much Idk
I've also read a few stories like this quite recently
A place like this sure could use more somali crime
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-WViLMs_4c
Due to Switzerland being a direct democracy, it actually has some ***🅱️ased*** laws
Like sometime ago, the Swiss Nationalist Party with a weird name I can't recall and a logo that looks like a pre-school, started a petition on whether or not to ban the construction minaret towers.
You know, which tend to be attached to mosques where the imam shouts prayers as you've probably seen in Islamic countries.
Anyway, under Swiss law when a petition reaches a certain number a public referendum must be held, and that's exactly what happened. And the majority of the Swiss people voted to ban the construction of minaret towers.
<:thinking_clown:590855640268668928>
after Iran and Iraq's offenses against the US, if both parties are pulled into full on conflict, who's allied against each side?
from what it seems like, it's going to be them against the rest of the world
Russia and China haven't asked us to btfo
I heard the US and Canada have sent forces over
In this situation our allies count, irans allies only count if they're dumb enough to think Iran will win, they started hostilities so the don't have a leg to stand on in calling on allies
yeah i'm pretty sure the rest of the Middle East is going to side with us because Iran was in the wrong here
That'd be fucking hilarious if a ME coalition helps us nae-nae the Iranian military <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
and hopefully this could be the start of bringing about peace in the middle east
They will if it escalates, Iran made sure of that
Direct threats on UAE and Dubai
only tyrant regimes that have been oppressing their own people will back tyrant regimes in Iran
so Iran is already divided
their people want freedom/peace
Not even, I think the other tyrant regimes hate Iran more than US right now
so Solemeini and his fellow butt buddies have been behind all the terrorism
and once all of them are knocked out