Message from @Eccles

Discord ID: 666990279760543759


2020-01-15 12:40:06 UTC  

Actually, they could quite easily be moved outside of london too

2020-01-15 12:40:44 UTC  

or they could if it wasn't already in Gloucestershire

2020-01-15 12:40:47 UTC  

lol.... immediately off the bat corbyn goes to defend Iran ๐Ÿ˜›

2020-01-15 12:41:15 UTC  

"pweese pwime minister, dont hhurwt Iwan ๐Ÿ˜ฆ "

2020-01-15 12:43:08 UTC  

omg.. corbyn said the assassination of solemani was illegal ๐Ÿ˜›

2020-01-15 12:43:14 UTC  

lol

2020-01-15 12:43:20 UTC  

his face is illegal

2020-01-15 12:43:27 UTC  

I think corbyn has just gone... Im leaving now so fck it ๐Ÿ˜›

2020-01-15 12:46:20 UTC  

...i thought that gchq was in cheltenham?

2020-01-15 12:47:03 UTC  

cheltenham is in gloucestershire

2020-01-15 12:50:27 UTC  

...right?

2020-01-15 12:53:21 UTC  

Why the heck is Boris planning scrap the boundary review reduction of seats from 650 to 600?

2020-01-15 12:53:28 UTC  

Something like that yes

2020-01-15 12:59:39 UTC  

what?

2020-01-15 12:59:45 UTC  

eccles, do you have a source on that

2020-01-15 12:59:56 UTC  

on what?

2020-01-15 13:00:07 UTC  

``[12:53] Eccles: Why the heck is Boris planning scrap the boundary review reduction of seats from 650 to 600?``

2020-01-15 13:00:20 UTC  

Sure

2020-01-15 13:00:40 UTC  

What will be the result of that boundary change

2020-01-15 13:01:14 UTC  

Idea is to ensure each constituency represents roughly the same number of citizens

2020-01-15 13:01:37 UTC  

^

2020-01-15 13:02:04 UTC  

At the moment, London is hopelessly overrepresented by MPs

2020-01-15 13:02:14 UTC  

So the result will probably be fewer Labour MPs

2020-01-15 13:03:28 UTC  

But not by much

2020-01-15 13:04:05 UTC  

the only thing there that says boris is planning on scrapping it is just literally those 14 words ``Borisโ€™s plan to scrap the boundary reviewโ€™s reduction of seats from 650 to 600.``

i combed the included video 3 times to find no mention of it and there appears to also be no further mention of it. so i think that this claim is false until otherwise proven

2020-01-15 13:04:43 UTC  

the focus seems to be more on the supreme court

2020-01-15 13:05:15 UTC  

so unless you have any other material on that, i'm inclined not to believe it

2020-01-15 13:05:56 UTC  

It's rumour

2020-01-15 13:06:03 UTC  

Referenced here:

2020-01-15 13:06:25 UTC  

oh wait.. Ive been watching last weeks PMQs ๐Ÿ˜› doh

2020-01-15 13:06:28 UTC  

yeah i read this too

2020-01-15 13:06:38 UTC  

so a rumour only, alright

2020-01-15 13:06:50 UTC  

we'll know when the concrete bill is proposed

2020-01-15 13:06:59 UTC  

either way, the boundary changes are necessary

2020-01-15 13:07:07 UTC  

as is supreme court reform

2020-01-15 13:08:22 UTC  

Fail, Wacka.

2020-01-15 13:10:10 UTC  

Are they doing anything about Scottish overrepresentation?

2020-01-15 13:11:03 UTC  

Scotland aren't overrepresented, unless you consider devolution to be such

2020-01-15 13:11:57 UTC  

They clearly are, The SNP got 48 seats with only 3.8% of the popular vote