I mean I think what they want is to remove as much volatility as they can.... this does seem like a bit of a cheat tho 😛

Oh absolutely, and there might not be a better way of measuring it

so the weights are essentially calibrated every february

Nevertheless, it -always- undereports true rates of inflation felt by the public, and the disparity gets worse the lower down the income scale you go

oh I missed PMQs

Meantime, Cummings is still beasting it:
https://order-order.com/2020/01/15/number-10-wants-cchq-moved-london/

lol.. move the cchq away from where all the terrorism that theyre supposed to be looking for is

conservative campaign headquarters is supposed to be looking for terrorism?

oh yeah cchq... whats the one I was thinking of.. 😛

gchq

yeah 😛

government comms hq

Actually, they could quite easily be moved outside of london too

or they could if it wasn't already in Gloucestershire

lol.... immediately off the bat corbyn goes to defend Iran 😛

"pweese pwime minister, dont hhurwt Iwan 😦 "

omg.. corbyn said the assassination of solemani was illegal 😛

lol

his face is illegal

I think corbyn has just gone... Im leaving now so fck it 😛

...i thought that gchq was in cheltenham?

cheltenham is in gloucestershire

...right?

Why the heck is Boris planning scrap the boundary review reduction of seats from 650 to 600?

Something like that yes

what?

eccles, do you have a source on that

on what?

``[12:53] Eccles: Why the heck is Boris planning scrap the boundary review reduction of seats from 650 to 600?``

Sure

https://order-order.com/2020/01/15/boris-court-reform/

What will be the result of that boundary change

Idea is to ensure each constituency represents roughly the same number of citizens

^

At the moment, London is hopelessly overrepresented by MPs

So the result will probably be fewer Labour MPs

But not by much

the only thing there that says boris is planning on scrapping it is just literally those 14 words ``Boris’s plan to scrap the boundary review’s reduction of seats from 650 to 600.``

i combed the included video 3 times to find no mention of it and there appears to also be no further mention of it. so i think that this claim is false until otherwise proven

the focus seems to be more on the supreme court

so unless you have any other material on that, i'm inclined not to believe it

It's rumour