Message from @EN
Discord ID: 680094708743274523
@Goddess Tyche ive seen decent pron of it
how much air fighting was there in korea?
It's also got way higher capacity than the B2
i know they took some dredful casualties in vietnam
"Sorry girl, I'm only interested in sayans that can go super sand."
You use the b52 after you have suppressed enemy anti air
well capacity doesnt matter much when you get shot down
@Lucienne d'Anwyl it’s a strategic nuclear bomber, it literally only has one purpose
surpressing anti air seems basically impossible
mobile AA is the norm
We have hell of all more B-52s than we do B2s
@SideTracker big fan of those pics
nuclear bombers are literally obsolete
and have been for at least 50 years
You really know fuck all about this
WOW you're retarded if you think that
how many nuclear bombs do we have?
0?
theyre all warheads
:/
Thousands
to launch a nuclear device it would have to get right above the target
The Valkyrie was decomissioned, and it was the only specialized nuclear bomber, so you're not exactly *wrong* per say
<:maxautism:596801011109330944>
through whatever AA they have
You have to pave the way first, even for b2s. Take out radar, and anti air, open the door.
However we still have plenty of nuclear-capable bombers
you wouldnt use a nuclear device on an opponent who was literally incapable of AA
pretty much all of them are
theyre for use against advanced powers
and seriously, you seem to think anti-air is infalliable
what are you gonna nuke iraq?
Yes
its not infallible but it makes a bomber less ideal than a submarine
It very , very much is not this impenitrable wall
i was under the imprssion you used nukes against enemies you want to fucking vaporize
or icbm
Seems to think weapon systems have only one purpose
NUKE ISRAEL