<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

Sometimes I am incensed to kill

Now is one of those moments

@Papa John's Day of Reckoning As good intended as that may be I doubt it'd work. I mean, rules peferably should be more than merely symbolic so it either would mean you'd have to force everyone to hide around or ignore the fact that people well under 21 like to fuck

Though you did mention the "small age gap" clause

@everybodydothatdinosaur Those are probably your sub Saharan genes kicking in

IMO age of consent laws should stay the same but statutory rape should have a 10 year limit of whatever it is called, and the state, nor the parents should be the ones required to initiate court proceedings

Statute of limitations

That’s what it’s called

Fucking fed @Papa John's Day of Reckoning

Maybe. I know little about consent laws in US so I cannot really comment much here.

https://pics.me.me/minimum-age-to-ge-9-9-6-32703227.png

I just think that if a 17 year old consents and the parents/state can prosecute even though the 17 year old was not only okay, but 10 years from now still remains okay with it, it’s kinda ridiculous

Nigger it's called state law.

@Uksio A rare case I could understand late abortion to be honest

That Indian man, I mean

Fulcrum, basically most states age of consent is 17 IIRC, and in many states it’s considered rape to have sex with someone under that age

Also, a minor lying about their age is *NOT* a reasonable defense

barring Rome and Juliett thing, I assume?

Or there's no such in US?

That’s a state to state basis

Ah.

last I heard, which was quite a while ago california didn’t have them

<:TimeToBarn:590594455657119812>

Doesn’t matter to me anymore either because I’m an adult now

But most places won’t prosecute for two minors either

Kinda weird. I guess then technically americans rape each other all the time, what's with teenagers worldwide fucking nowadays. Suddenly, feminist statistics of prevalence of rape in US makes sense!