Message from @dodo.sh
Discord ID: 419344099607314433
well, fun gun at least, getting a ppq for defense
I really wonder what the hell he shot at 0:55
did he just put some powder in that botte?
geez, a gun like this has such tiny litte parts https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxSgLh4zZMY
"lol jokes on them I'm just pretending to be retarded", the twitter profile
dangit where's my pop in
LIVE NOW! #292 TRUMP WANTS YOUR GUNS?! Jordan Peterson and Kyle Kashuv | Louder With Crowder
Crowder is going live soon.
maybe that should go in politics but... its relevant
god dammit my dad is dumb, I tried to explain to him five times what a "well regulated milita" is supposed to mean and the still thinks it means government regulation
"pretty soon we'll have weapons that don't actually have bullets"
what the fuck
Gonna laugh if he ever finds out about caseless ammunition
I really hope I don't have to encounter any more people like that who know astonishingly little for having been in the military, but I'm sure I will. Idiots and fake experts everywhere.
@Thomas the Sowell Train [USA]
Yeah, 30 to 40 years being optimistic
Thomas the Sowell Train: "pretty soon we'll have weapons that don't actually have bullets"
it's called "running out of ammo"
Did you try describing the Militia Act of 1903's significance to him?
oh, of course
god forbid msn know how to make a link that works properly
@Legiondude Never heard of it. Thanks for that.
@Thomas the Sowell Train [USA] The 1903 act sets the stage for the modern design of US Militia. For something more what was on the mind of the Founding Fathers, the 2nd Militia act of 1792 outlines all the equipment individuals are expected to procure on their own, how frequently they needed to train, and how to organize in preparation of need to defend the country
This the "well regulated" part of the 2A
Under the 1903 design, it seems either the unorganized militia are to integrate/reinforce National Guard units or be deemed sufficiently equipped/organized by their local Governor(however that happens) to match the NG's standard
In a twisted manner, this line of logic could be used to justify access to automatic weapons again but also against private procurement
pretty sure 'national guard' didn't become the national guard until around 1903, too, which might explain a few things
welp, there we go
` The title "National Guard" was used in 1824 by some New York State militia units, named after the French National Guard in honor of the Marquis de Lafayette. "National Guard" became a standard nationwide militia title in 1903, and specifically indicated reserve forces under mixed state and federal control since 1933.`
Finally some green tip. Thanks Israel.
>The 1903 act sets the stage for the modern design of US Militia. For something more what was on the mind of the Founding Fathers, the 2nd Militia act of 1792 outlines all the equipment individuals are expected to procure on their own, how frequently they needed to train, and how to organize in preparation of need to defend the country
ok like
you realize that anti-gun folks in the US are going to have no problem turning that into an argument for their own side? as in, calling out existing owners for falling short
I did
Which was my 3rd point
However a turnaround argument would be that in light of federal regulations keeping the Reserve Militia from being able to arm themselves with military standard equipment, they should be entitled to access of the next best alternative. i.e. AR-15's and the like
ah