Message from @Reaps
Discord ID: 429864565019246613
How credible is this?
big if true
It's from a website that got posted on /pol/.
So not credible at all.
But it's actually possible without any conspiracy.
They had the event already planned, and the shooting conveniently happened. Because frankly there's like one every month or two.
I will wait for a credible place to say something about it
But yeah, this theory is plausible
still, people might say that the whole thing was a inside job to ban guns
Hello fellow gun lovers
Do you know where you put your guns?
I'd like to examine them
si
esé where are the assault rifles @OliveBlanc
lol
did he mislabel assault weapons as assault rifles?
I can't watch children commit suicide.
Meanwhile, 5 years in the past.... https://imgur.com/gallery/ftFa9KX/comment/37727448
man arrested for building autonomous weapon
Friendly reminder that the ABC has been a piece of shit for a while now
@Reaps how do you feel about that use of strayan tax dollaers?
Someone posted a link on SoA about it
So I'll be chasing that up
CONVENIENT
To what?
"An AR-15."
UNBIASED™
"high velocity assault rifle"
what, do they travel through the *fuckin' air* all by themselves now?
It shouldn't even be that hard to classify what an assault rifle is, but because it involves people trying to ban things they don't like, they just mire it down in legal jargon
HMMMM
<:think_woke:378717098681171988>
I wonder if you designed a trigger that would essentially perform the action of a bump stock by requiring you to maintain pressure yet automatically resetting itself every time the trigger is pulled, whether that would be a legal way to increase rate of fire like a bump stock. Doesn't the law simply require one pull of the trigger to make multiple discharges of the weapon for it to count? This way it still requires trigger pulls because the reset is automatic, but not the discharge itself.
and I wonder what a trigger like that would do to your finger...