The difference is stark.

Aaaand yeah, Same here @Deleted User

I haven't played much of 3 or 4

Just don't like them at all

I thought 3 was a pretty good game

It was more consistent lore wise then 4

There were a looooot of inconsistencies

they're just so well known now that people forgot

Shit like vault 87 mutants, the brotherhood, the Enclave even beign alive

a lot of contrivances for the sake of iconic thigns

radscorpions being in DC

deathclaws, jet...

Like shit that *can* be in a place, but it really does raise the question of *why* they're in the place.

Also the appearance of Enclave Power Armor is odd

it's 100 before everything

Also a lot of dumb shit like the kids in the cave

also, the fact that there is no NPCs

That's 76

I was talking about 3

76 just looks like disaster

it's just... they are making fallout online, and pretending it's something new

It could be good but oooof

I'm excited but I've never played any other Fallout game

it could easily be a DLC for F4

congrats you're the target audience

apparently

but isn't it a bit early to write it off?

if it's as big as they say it is there has to be more to it

No

It’s just rust in fallout

but it will let me nuke my friends and foes alike....

The map size is just map size

It's 4x as big as Fallout 4 but Fallout 4 took place in a city whereas 76 takes place in a forest

but why make such a large map if you're only going to fill it with 12 (I think?) player controlled characters

so you can build shit

It's going to be way emptier

Not that that's necessarily a bad thing

but it's not the whole story

I just feel like there has to be more to it than what was talked about, otherwise like fulcrum said, this would just be a DLC

can't tell you, I've watched all the interviews and shit and remain unimpressed as a fan of RPGs

maybe someone who likes Rust can help