Message from @Ondsinet
Discord ID: 554029727841517593
true
I think much of what he did would have been acceptable. But he did shit way beyond the pale for an honorable person to do.
Rape was undoubtedly extremely common back then, but was kept quiet because it was disgraceful.
Colombus was disgraceful, therefore, not just because he did those things, but also because of the sheer SCALE at which he did them. The Pope did not give pardon to all sins like the crusaders. The people would have wanted him lynched if they found out and had any actual power. Superstition is a hell of a thing, don't want your city destroyed because a sodomizer of thousands walks through.
Missionaries didnt come until around his 3rd expedition. People who were not converted were seen as animals and lessers. Between his 3rd expidetion and his 4th his crimes were being counted due to now he was a governor, and the locals were being converted and deamed spanish citizens. He soon after (soon being relative as things happened back then) was stripped of titles, land, and prestige as punishment.
His first expidition he actually didnt commit any notable crimes of the time, as he actually did believe he was in the east indies, and wasnt completely sure if that was unclaimed territory yet. By the second he knew for sure and started the atrocities (many of which were not even crimes back then for before stated reasons as well as time frame.)
so which age was the line of rape in spain?
cock and balls
my ancestors
It was Romans that did that
Not a surprise tho, we've literally found cave paintings from the dawn of humanity of dicks
We found carvings of ancient "X was here," grafiti, so.
the Vikings did love to do that to.
LOL
"This is very high."
Fucking legendary.
5D trans-millenial shitposting
@Broo TulsiGang 2024 ๐ฌ๐ง ๐บ๐ธ
Those worm things...
Proof that bugs are bio-robots
Like an overly complex wind up toy
<:what:382980756139409409>
๐คท
I replied to an older comment up above from Broo
It's a screenshot
lol
๐๐ฟ
great
In the bible, adam and eve repopulate the earth by having an insane amount of children, which then go on to create an offspring among themselfes.
That would be incestuous and supposedly impossible/incredibly harmful for a species, because of, you know, small gene pool.
Turns out tho, that modern humanity really descends from an incredibly small population, due to some catastrophe that let only a very small gene pool, which is also probably why incest is so damaging for humans
<:think_woke:378717098681171988>
```The Toba eruption has been linked to a genetic bottleneck in human evolution about 70,000 years ago,[28][29] which may have resulted from a severe reduction in the size of the total human population due to the effects of the eruption on the global climate.[30] According to the genetic bottleneck theory, between 50,000 and 100,000 years ago, human populations sharply decreased to 3,000โ10,000 surviving individuals.[31][32] It is supported by some genetic evidence suggesting that today's humans are descended from a very small population of between 1,000 and 10,000 breeding pairs that existed about 70,000 years ago```
@Ondsinet Another hypothesis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5i8H977qFtA
I like graham Hancockโs asteroid hypothesis more