Message from @meratrix
Discord ID: 377163754254893066
More likely to face violent splinter groups
you can't be draconian to people with guns, its just not possible
it is a deterrent, but given the worst situation
Also good as a defense to occupation
its not about an active revolution its about preventing that from ever needing to be neccesary
Again you give too much credit to people
why not both
the second ammendment is there as a deterrnet, but in the worst situation it justifies it to the larger population.
sooooo both of you are correct
you really think you know better than other people as to what they should do with their life?
fucking collectivists.
Why can't you own tanks and such?
So you assert that people have free will?
you can
I'm gonna buy a tank one day and drive it around in an open field
yeha, the largest gun a American can actually buy is basically an artillery piece
are there any private tanks then? How about some personal nuclear devices
people can own tanks
this too
does it stand a chance against a modern one?
you just can't have the ammo i guess
The US government would never Nuke it's own population because they would be destroying themselves
It does not
An Abrams would fuck that thing up
no but these are whats actually available
perhaps not, but you could keep them off your backs
you can buy an abrams!
you don't own a tank to fight with it
theres nothing about an abrams that make them illegal to own they're simply not sold
how about some private drones
you own it to collect it
military grade
the same thing with a old car
you can own a Jet
F16s