Message from @Reaps
Discord ID: 417734908308619285
They would have joined even if there was no video.
>Armed forces attacked the U.S. consulate during a protest against an anti-Islamist film. Numerous eyewitnesses reported that the attackers said they were reacting to the film Innocence of Muslims.
but probably that too
>A militant organization known as Ansar al-Shariah told people on the scene that they were upset over the video.
So it was probably a planned attack, and the planners used the video to rile more people up and join them.
It's certain imams that incite these riots and attacks
They waited until Sep 11.
It was a planned attack. They would have attacked regardless.
they send their indoctrinated followers out to do their dirty work
and they have a limitless supply of those
Right, it certainly looks like a planned attack, and it also looks like the organizers used the film to energize more people to bolster their numbers.
They knew they could garner support by the outrage the film had caused.
Video had been produced and was being screened since June that year.
That's what they did during the so-called "Muhammed-drawing crisis" in Denmark. How did muslims outside of Denmark catch wind of a cartoon appearing on a single page of a Danish newspaper, and why did the rioting and such happen a long time after it had aired, without incident in Denmark?
Here's what I think happened: Hillary and Obama tried to turn it into *their* 9/11, but it backfired with all the evidence of negligence and cover up.
Because radical muslim imams here saw it as an opportunity, and took it back "home" to spread their propaganda, and incite violence and rioting.
So you mean they wanted to use it to generate support for military actions?
and growth of powers?
regarding Hillary and Obama's 9/11
Possibly, yes.
Time for Ben to continue murdering Sheriff Israel
hmm, first time Ben is going to bash Israel <:think_woke:378717098681171988>
My sides
ha
pretty sure someone tried to alt-right trap Ben in his last Q&A
Tell me that 'preface' (and the question that follows) doesn't sound a w f u l l y similar to a certain train of thought
https://youtu.be/U-Sr6Zd8oSI?t=35m1s
SCHMUCK
Yeah he rekt that one
` I'm not sure how ben actually defused him. Ben starts his speech talking about how it's anti Semitic to boycott Israel yet he claims Israel is not an ethnic state.ο»Ώ`
herp derp
maybe because people aren't wanting to BDS Israel 'because it's Israel'?
I'm sure some people might be, but I have little doubt a huge chunk of them *are* doing it because they fucking hate Jews
Usually the same ones whom only embrace, as Ben pointed out, the 'ethnic identify' of Jewishness, whereby you can be as completely areligious as you want without giving up your 'Jewish identify'
wouldn't the pertinent "ethnic identity" be israeli, rather than jewish?
The US acting like they know any better is hilarious too