Message from @Goblin_Slayer_Floki

Discord ID: 463808560514596866


2018-07-03 17:47:23 UTC  

Why though?

2018-07-03 17:47:29 UTC  

If not for Christianity.

2018-07-03 17:47:43 UTC  

Polygamy creates more violent societies

2018-07-03 17:47:49 UTC  

anyway, have to afk for a while

2018-07-03 17:48:12 UTC  

<:super_edgy:426099058466095119>

2018-07-03 17:49:17 UTC  

The Romans weren't actually too violent, and they certainly were promiscuous. Before the 'but they took over places', they were very, very kind occupiers.

2018-07-03 17:49:35 UTC  

Generally wanted to avoid bloodshed.

2018-07-03 17:49:52 UTC  

You had legions. So they used their violence productively

2018-07-03 17:50:10 UTC  

Last I remember, back during that time, raping and pillaging were morally acceptable.

2018-07-03 17:50:21 UTC  

Not something I heard of the legion doing very often.

2018-07-03 17:50:49 UTC  

It's hard to maintain an empire abroad when you've ransacked the new neighbors

2018-07-03 17:51:32 UTC  

Tell that to how many other armies have taken over places and done the same.

2018-07-03 17:51:38 UTC  

And maintained the same.

2018-07-03 17:51:52 UTC  

See also: Afghanistan

2018-07-03 17:52:47 UTC  

At the time, the Romans were fairly progressive. I've had this argument come up before.

2018-07-03 17:53:18 UTC  

They had volunteers from conquered cities reinforcing their legions.

2018-07-03 17:53:59 UTC  

Yes, which is why they didn't usually ransack new lands, until later in the empire era

2018-07-03 17:54:16 UTC  

probably helped the collapse a bit

2018-07-03 17:54:51 UTC  

Unfortunately, power corrupts.

2018-07-03 18:31:43 UTC  

If only Caesar hadn't gotten shanked

2018-07-03 20:49:37 UTC  

Yes, the roman legions did have *auxillary* of local forces, but to the romans they were more or less meat shields. And it in turn lead to a lot of the issues as the foriegn elements were soon let into the senate and broke the whole system down.

2018-07-04 00:09:45 UTC  

That's... sort of just the whole concept of a vanguard.

2018-07-04 00:23:38 UTC  

There were plenty of native auxilliaries that the Romans respected. The Romans had little of a cavalry or archery tradition, so they were quite welcoming to native auxilliaries that could take care of those problems.

2018-07-04 00:28:30 UTC  

@Somi hi again

2018-07-04 01:58:44 UTC  

i think with that meme, capitalism shoe is a bit higher

2018-07-04 01:59:01 UTC  

maybe there's a car jack helping lift it up a bit (economic growth let them invent it)

2018-07-04 01:59:09 UTC  

or you could just replace 'capitalism' with neoliberalism

2018-07-04 02:17:20 UTC  

"Stop being so smart because these other people aren't as smart and we can't meet our ethnicity quota. It's absolute cancer." >> Later someone responds with: "I just used your Affirmitive action argument, and made a hardline liberal rage quit in five minutes or less. IRL." <:pepe_smile:378719407977005068>

2018-07-04 02:30:51 UTC  
2018-07-04 02:48:55 UTC  

The sad thing is, somebody needs to legit save the Dems from spiraling down into irrelevance.

2018-07-04 02:49:19 UTC  

Because we know there are lunatics in the Republicans too.

2018-07-04 02:52:29 UTC  

The country needs democrats.

2018-07-04 02:52:53 UTC  

In much the same was as it needs republicans. Or at least some kind of opposition.

2018-07-04 02:53:38 UTC  

The crazy repubs are already dying off in the party. Another party will replace the dems

2018-07-04 02:55:07 UTC  

No, we saw some biblethumpers come out of the woodwork to blame video games again last mass shooting.

2018-07-04 02:57:00 UTC  

Hmm, I guess. I don't see the populace being like that though

2018-07-04 03:06:00 UTC  

It'd be great if the death of the dems leads to a power vacuum that new parties can fill

2018-07-04 03:06:02 UTC  

eg. libertarians

2018-07-04 03:06:08 UTC  

don't just prop up a corpse