Do you want my address?

I think @khimære just wants to understand how the swastika, while not illegal, could lead to someone's arrest. The answer is quite simple. They were posted on someone else's private property.

Jimmy that's not quite the whole story.

But I think @Australopithecus Jordan has a good point.

No, it's not the whole story, but I didn't want to tell the part about you self-reporting your crime.

lol

Jimmy is right. It might not be the whole story, but it's the part that counts. You weren't arrested over a swastika; they may not have liked your swastikas, but the charges they were able to file on you stemmed from the manner in which you distributed your opinions. You should be intellectually honest about that.

I'm of the opinion that the biggest failing on our part is the rejection of valuable operatives over their choice of tactics and strategies. Choosing to wear a mask does not necessarily undermine the opportunities of those choosing not to wear masks, nor vice versa. Choosing to implement SIEGE does not necessarily undermine the efforts of those choosing to implement Rules for Radicals, nor vice versa. We aren't losing because persons favoring one strategy or the other are "wrong," as the core disagreement there is really about effectiveness. We lose because we elevate the effectiveness argument to such a lofty place of importance that it becomes personalized, and we then feel compelled to reject a person simply because they disagree with me over wearing a tie/boots/mask...

^^^. Incidentally, I wore a tie on the day of the "JEWS DID 911" demonstration and I don't think it hurt me in the eyes of the cop who responded.

The flyers drew attention only because of the swastikas

Medford got the same treatment and didnt give 1 fuck

And they were only able to criminalize those swastikas due to the method by which you procured them.

Yes, the swastika flyers drew attention, but @khimære already knows that swastikas draw attention. He wants to know how that attention gets translated into an arrest.

By people complaining and filing charges

People can complain all they want, but that doesn't lead to an arrest if no crime was committed.

The reason I'm belaboring this point is not to condemn you, @Wehrmacht . It's to help you clarify your thinking. Your insistence the the swastika caused your arrest leads to the type of thinking you were doing the other day when you declared "no swastikas or I'm out".

There was no crime. Thats why charges got dropped

Do what you want. Ive made myself pretty clear as to why I think the way I do.

The was a crime you got arrested, paid the price and could learn from your mistake if you would but acknowledge it.

40 flyers with no swastikas got ignored. 5 with swastikas got me jail. What's the denominator ?

The imagery

We're not looking for a common denominator. We're looking at the cause of your arrest which is, beyond and shadow of a doubt the fact the you taped your flyers to private businesses and then posted a photograph of yourself with the incriminating evidence on the Internet.

The cause was that, while other flyers existed o. The same businesses, they didmt lile MY flyers

On the*

Even the professor of law that BuzzFeed contacted agreed it was a back hole loophole designed to punish my freedom of speech because they didn't like it that should tell you something

The pic was big but not why they visited me

I believe the point some are trying to make is that if you hadn't put them up where you did, it wouldn't have mattered who liked them and who didn't.

Is there any evidence of that? Because I put my flyers right next to other flyers that existed on some of these businesses which means they're okay with some flyers but not others

Clearly dependent upon the elements or context of the propaganda apparently

The downside of refusing to take responsibility for one's mistakes is that it deprives one of the opportunity to learn from them

The Facebook comment not being offended tipped them off

Everyone in the comments not offended was accused

And 3 we're interviewed according to Facebook accusations

According to police report

It's important to note that these charges are made up because while they try to cite me for putting them on businesses even though those business is already had Flyers put up by Third parties they also try to get me for putting one on public property which we all pay tax money to sustain which means I have the right to put it there

Literally a professor of law said that this was just a way to punish my speech and silence it

I'm going to go ahead and trust them on that because all of the evidence points toward you didn't commit a crime since they dropped all the charges and basically apologized

The downside of refusing to take responsibility for one's mistakes is that it deprives one of the opportunity to learn from them

The downside to the internet is that everyone has an advanced degree in Google law

Know it alls are annoying and they cause infighting, "my way is right and everyone else is compromising, no 100% like me King fascist". We have all already agreed that we respect each others methods and reasons for them. No need to discuss any further. This is operations so why don't we talk about doing some activism?

What I learned is that cakes will charge you or try for putting flyers on public or private property