Message from @Goblin_Slayer_Floki

Discord ID: 509807273137274915


2018-11-07 18:05:39 UTC  

Question is if they will be heard. SCOTUS is gonna be super busy between Fed suits and others.

2018-11-07 18:05:56 UTC  

You know all of those Abortion Measures that passed will go to SCOTUS too

2018-11-07 18:06:00 UTC  

any of y'all watch the video?

didn't click

2018-11-07 18:40:23 UTC  

🚨 THOT ALERT 🚨

2018-11-07 18:57:16 UTC  

jesus fucking christ you newfags never seem to understand the utility of moats

2018-11-07 18:57:56 UTC  

on its own a moat is hardly effective at all--only when coupled with existing defenses does it become useful

2018-11-07 18:58:37 UTC  

you spaced out fantasists think a bunch of beaners can't ford a ditch?

2018-11-07 18:59:01 UTC  

STOP TALKING ABOUT MOATS FAGGO

2018-11-07 18:59:26 UTC  

@Goblin_Slayer_Floki the issue with the abortion issues is that the measure was sent to the voters and they decided the issue not the law makers so the supreme court may have to say the voter has the right

2018-11-07 19:00:49 UTC  

Unless scotus states the measure itself is unconstitutional.

2018-11-07 19:01:01 UTC  

The 14th took a lot of rights away

2018-11-07 19:01:37 UTC  

Well powers i should say

2018-11-07 19:03:20 UTC  

The right to Choice should disqualify all women from receiving child support

2018-11-07 19:08:09 UTC  

Men should have the right to choice.

But i mean dna tests dont overrule court order child support. So prolly never happen.

2018-11-07 19:10:25 UTC  

wait so even if you are proven categorically to not be the father

2018-11-07 19:10:33 UTC  

you would still be liable

2018-11-07 19:10:44 UTC  

You can be.

2018-11-07 19:11:01 UTC  

Some states use implied responsibility.

2018-11-07 19:12:05 UTC  

Example.
Man and woman together. Kid born. 5 years after divorce. Man gets child support ordered. Man proves dna isnt his. Man still ordered to pay as "implied responsibility after 5 years"

2018-11-07 19:12:44 UTC  

I suppose if you had been a father to that child for 5 years it's not entirely unreasonable

2018-11-07 19:13:53 UTC  

it is, because youre the one throwing the bone out

2018-11-07 19:13:57 UTC  

I thought you meant like, with wife/gf for X years, she gets pregnant and you know it's not yours, leave her for being a cheating thot

2018-11-07 19:14:12 UTC  

get ordered to pay child support

2018-11-07 19:14:16 UTC  

prove child isn't yours

2018-11-07 19:14:21 UTC  

still have to pay child support

2018-11-07 19:15:29 UTC  

cancel child support and keep single moms home on the weekend, not up in the club

2018-11-07 19:15:54 UTC  

that will also aid towards them not having more children

2018-11-07 19:16:34 UTC  

@turtwig that can happen too

2018-11-07 19:16:47 UTC  

But those usually get alimony more than child support

2018-11-07 19:17:00 UTC  

fuck that noise

2018-11-07 19:17:09 UTC  

my mama be on that alimony <:pepe_sad:378719408345841664>

2018-11-07 19:17:13 UTC  

I ain't paying no alimony to a cheating thot

2018-11-07 19:17:32 UTC  

The key is if child support is ordered before or after dna, and what state it is in.

2018-11-07 19:17:53 UTC  

always get your dna first

2018-11-07 19:19:15 UTC  

Women should have to prove all the money went to the child

2018-11-07 19:19:18 UTC  

I also wouldn't pay child support for someone else's kid

2018-11-07 19:19:26 UTC  

The fact dna doesnt mute the order is stupid

2018-11-07 19:19:33 UTC  

@M4Gunner agreed

2018-11-07 19:19:39 UTC  

Or they lose it