The right to Choice should disqualify all women from receiving child support

Men should have the right to choice.

But i mean dna tests dont overrule court order child support. So prolly never happen.

wait so even if you are proven categorically to not be the father

you would still be liable

You can be.

Some states use implied responsibility.

Example.
Man and woman together. Kid born. 5 years after divorce. Man gets child support ordered. Man proves dna isnt his. Man still ordered to pay as "implied responsibility after 5 years"

I suppose if you had been a father to that child for 5 years it's not entirely unreasonable

it is, because youre the one throwing the bone out

I thought you meant like, with wife/gf for X years, she gets pregnant and you know it's not yours, leave her for being a cheating thot

get ordered to pay child support

prove child isn't yours

still have to pay child support

cancel child support and keep single moms home on the weekend, not up in the club

that will also aid towards them not having more children

@turtwig that can happen too

But those usually get alimony more than child support

fuck that noise

my mama be on that alimony <:pepe_sad:378719408345841664>

I ain't paying no alimony to a cheating thot

The key is if child support is ordered before or after dna, and what state it is in.

always get your dna first

Women should have to prove all the money went to the child

I also wouldn't pay child support for someone else's kid

The fact dna doesnt mute the order is stupid

@M4Gunner agreed

Or they lose it

Of course that would never happen

there goes that weekend dress buying fund

Cause then states would have to lower child support rates. A 6 year old doesnt need 800 a month to survive

yeah they do xbox live

Xbone live is a yearly sub

So monthly like 5 dollars

fidget spinners

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=376FZ3vd07w&t=493s

Speaking of Fidget Spinners.

Fuck fidget spinners

And cell phones

Kids need none of that

Discipline

All they need