Message from @James Peterson
Discord ID: 674398768153624625
Yang knows what's up when it comes to racial hostility
I am sympathetic towards many of the ideas here, such as being opposed to the anti-white narrative that pervades western nations, being on board with European pride etc. But I am just wondering, why is it necessary to have an ethnostate?
@Patrick Clifford#9447 Very simple.
1)Homogeneous countries are more high trust.
2)Because each ethnic group has a proclivity towards their own kin, and wants to be around those like themeselves on ethnic and cultural lines. This not an argument that ethnonationalism is justified by virtue of being instinctively adhered to by the constituents of most ethnic groups, but that each group having and recognising each others' right to self-determination is conducive to preference satisfaction and thus well-being.
It's, crucially, only whites that are frown upon by wanting to preserve their own groups
Oh shit nvm
He left
wtf
I think he got banned
Was probably an alt or something
From that scottish named guy
<:ohaiShrug:553954608037494784>
@James Peterson Also add that homogenous areas have much higher social capital
@Monstrous Moonshine Very true, thanks for mentioning it!
This is a good article on that
@James Peterson I’m with the CIA, I believe you’ve been radicalized. Come with me
<:fbi:418878655822036994>
<:Gun:639978512207314973>
<:Mmm:639996270995570709>
Interesting pick. He's probably the only one left that can drain bernie voters
Because if they were going to go for the other 3, they would have done so by now
I don't get how Buttigieg wins but not the popular vote. I thought this was based off popular vote
they've only tabulated 60~% of the vote.....
or i should say, released info pertaining to 60%
pete buttigieg is the hot new thing, win or lose
just a heads up, I'm leaving the server, maybe just for a bit. Its a nice server but I've been procrastinating too much by looking at all the dank memes on here T_T
have fun everyone! 😄 <:yay:638817157840502815> <:comfy:639985510785351680>
emojis are awesome here too lol
alright bro! hope to see u soon 🙂
peace homes
see you on the other side homeslice
He could of just *not* interact in here <:athSM:647800405467594765>
he was so close to getting a new role too 😭
The accelerated adoption of Liberalism as political policy has provided a gift that only the most ambitious can appreciate. This demand for Will a single human alone cannot satisfy leaves open a vacuum of space to occupy. In what way should we reply? Over time civilization has experienced the erosion of corrupt institutionalized religions and atomization of the human soul into a state of servitude. Technological progress has provided a limited means to disassociate from traditional confinement to territory that until recently was intricate to meaningful political accomplishment. The opportunity for our true expression awaits to be recognized.
Is true Liberalism a true opposition?
The extent to which true believers of liberal policy practice Liberalism where it is not, is the extent to which a nation can establish order unopposed by Liberalism. Since only nations can be enemies of other nations, Liberalism provided the means for nations to name people as enemies. In this context politics is ideologically asymmetrical. We must fight for the freedom to be who we are, not for the freedom to oppose those who choose to fight us for being. Where we require those who opposes us to validate who we are, we are not free to discover what that true expression is.
Liberalism is a natural outgrowth to the emergence of civilizations as organized states. This political imperative, it’s true believers act upon, is more so done in absence of Willful agency. This provides the opportunity for a collection of Willful agents with the Will to impose their agency upon true believers. The Willful agents achieve for themselves stability of power, are thus dependent on Liberal policy as a system of belief, and therefore are its greatest spiritual advocates. The degree to which one may be a beneficiary of Liberal policy is inversely proportional to the degree to which one is a practitioner of its belief advocated. Their power is expressed as disregard to what they make true to their believers. Despite not being practitioners of this belief themselves, these Willful agents find it necessary to impose this belief even when it may appear inconvenient to themselves at the expense of the believers and the system they occupy. To these Willful agents, Liberal policy is a calculated cost for the legitimacy to project power. They succeed only by defeating each other. Their lack of ability to express unity is their greatest weakness and evident by their greatest lie. It should then be no surprise where a Willful agent may be found to oppose other Willful agents who act upon the interest of collective Willful agency as equal men. Liberal policy advocates have damned themselves Willingly by pursuing a strategy of stability which requires avoiding accountability.
