Message from @Patrick Clifford

Discord ID: 674287744830406667


2020-02-04 02:38:09 UTC  

If you conspired to murder someone. You should be punished for conspiring to murder someone. It doesn't matter if you used your speech to do it.

2020-02-04 02:39:04 UTC  

I don't think it conflicts with freedom of speech to punish acts.

2020-02-04 02:39:57 UTC  

If I scream in someone's ear so loud that they get hearing loss, I should get punished for that but I shoudn't get punished because of the word I was screaming.

2020-02-04 02:40:04 UTC  

That's my general position at least.

2020-02-04 02:40:59 UTC  

Punish acts, don't have a list of words or ideas that cannot be spoken under penalty of law. (unless maybe you have state secrets or non disclosure agreements or something like that)

2020-02-04 04:02:27 UTC  

Curt Doolittle is absolutely right on this issue. Everyone should be free to say whatever they want, but you should also be totally accountable for anything you say that has consequence.

2020-02-04 05:29:30 UTC  

@JFGariepy Any plans for TPS #666? Discussion of LaVeyan Satanism perhaps? The Catholics in the crowd might not like it, but I think it would be interesting.

2020-02-04 05:43:40 UTC  

do Crowley instead but yea do something spooky on 666

2020-02-04 05:43:48 UTC  

<:ahem:639979147782914084>

2020-02-04 06:16:36 UTC  

I always thought it would be silly to have anyone but Styx on for that one

2020-02-04 06:40:56 UTC  

Or Razorfist

2020-02-04 06:46:18 UTC  

Interesting guest, but not for #666

2020-02-04 06:46:22 UTC  

better for #669

2020-02-04 08:18:07 UTC  

Crowley would be interesting too, yeah

2020-02-04 08:25:18 UTC  

I remember back in the day, there were a lot of Varg Vikernes fans in the chat

2020-02-04 08:25:32 UTC  

haven't seen them much recently lol

2020-02-04 08:26:48 UTC  

now that Christianity has become popular again on the right

2020-02-04 15:39:26 UTC  

Based and Ryan-Faulk-pilled

2020-02-04 15:40:02 UTC  

Yang knows what's up when it comes to racial hostility

2020-02-04 16:18:46 UTC  

I am sympathetic towards many of the ideas here, such as being opposed to the anti-white narrative that pervades western nations, being on board with European pride etc. But I am just wondering, why is it necessary to have an ethnostate?

2020-02-04 16:23:32 UTC  

@Patrick Clifford#9447 Very simple.
1)Homogeneous countries are more high trust.
2)Because each ethnic group has a proclivity towards their own kin, and wants to be around those like themeselves on ethnic and cultural lines. This not an argument that ethnonationalism is justified by virtue of being instinctively adhered to by the constituents of most ethnic groups, but that each group having and recognising each others' right to self-determination is conducive to preference satisfaction and thus well-being.

2020-02-04 16:24:28 UTC  

It's, crucially, only whites that are frown upon by wanting to preserve their own groups

2020-02-04 16:24:32 UTC  

Oh shit nvm

2020-02-04 16:24:36 UTC  

He left

2020-02-04 16:32:28 UTC  

wtf

2020-02-04 16:34:40 UTC  

I think he got banned

2020-02-04 16:34:47 UTC  

Was probably an alt or something

2020-02-04 16:35:05 UTC  

From that scottish named guy

2020-02-04 17:35:25 UTC  

<:ohaiShrug:553954608037494784>

2020-02-04 22:27:18 UTC  

@James Peterson Also add that homogenous areas have much higher social capital

2020-02-04 22:27:48 UTC  

@Monstrous Moonshine Very true, thanks for mentioning it!

2020-02-04 22:27:56 UTC  

This is a good article on that

2020-02-04 23:27:42 UTC  

@James Peterson I’m with the CIA, I believe you’ve been radicalized. Come with me

2020-02-04 23:27:48 UTC  

<:fbi:418878655822036994>

2020-02-04 23:39:56 UTC  

@snake Oh shit. Don't arrest me, I am half Jewish. I will sue you for antisemitism

2020-02-04 23:40:20 UTC  

<:Gun:639978512207314973>

2020-02-04 23:40:30 UTC  

<:Mmm:639996270995570709>