finally someone with a brain

who deleted my first post, you sore loser

in which I gave the proof of god and jesus, i guess you'll never know now

There's proof of Jesus?

yes

it's called this BIBLE

<:dab:395562678153904128>

The Bible is proof of Jesus like Spiderman-Comics are proof for Spiderman. It is a proof of a story which does not necessarily took place in the real world.

wasn't there even other suff ther proves that Jesus lived??
ike other historical documents

Yes.

Historical facts:
- After his crucifixion Jesus was buried by Joseph of Arimathea in a tomb.
- On the Sunday after the crucifixion, Jesus tomb was found empty by a group of his women followers.
- On different occasions and under various circumstances different individuals and groups of people experienced appearances of Jesus alive from the dead.
- The original disciples suddenly and sincerely came to believe that Jesus was risen from the dead despite their having every predisposition to the contrary.

Even if you don't believe in the miracles, it's widely acknowledged by historians that a man called Jesus did exist in the flesh and blood around 2k years ago

bruv just hit the emojis

alot of the stories ascribed to said man might not even be him, or true

the bible is the jj abrahams version of a bunch of urban legends 500 years earlier

I personally think Jesus may have been heir to the Hasmonean throne.

I personally think Jesus may have been a mushroom

Badgers

There is no true Scotsman.

Prove me wrong.

Fallacy.

Done.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NL6CDFn2i3I

ol skool

mushroom MUSHROOM

Newgrounds gang-gang

I can honestly see why God would save Catholics over Protestants

Not on their own, @The Eternal Swede , but if every conventional measure of normal evidence gets undermined by technology, they eventually CAN use that to argue the case for...say, state enforced DNA banks. Or tracking software.

They can use that to argue for those things already, as they know about the existence of deep fakes

Where the tech goes from here, publicity-wise, doesn't affect that very much

They can and will make whatever arguments they like, and if not these arguments, they will make other ones

I don't think the existence of deep fakes *meaningfully* affects their ability to create a deeper police state, is what I'm trying to say

We'll see if this won't be used past making porn video's about AOC

no such thing as state overreach

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I don't have any numbers on it, but i'd be curious to know what are the predominant evidence methods currently used to convict criminals.

None of you believe there will be a transition period for stuff like this? People will be instantly redpilled? I dont buy it. Especially in Europe where people get convicted for tweets they cant even prove were written by them.

I bet the jews love this though, it means soon you can personify your stepmom pornhub fantasies

no people are selected by the redpill

and people like u and i will only propogate if the redpill selection machine helps with fertility and lifestyle

haha, soon™