.agree

it's in our interests to stir up shit in hong kong

true, newton and maxwell were goyim

the earth is a flat disk, it sits on pillars and is covered in a transparent dome. the whole structure is submerged in a celestial ocean

which is why the sky is blue

she's a cutie

@TheUserNameofPeace why is she in trouble

non christians go to hell

finally someone with a brain

nick's appeal is he isn't a fag like spencer

yes

because he didnt cuck

nick is great

you cant cost-effectively artificially manufacturer an element

the brown one is hers

dyer embarrassed himself badly when he tried to debunk aquinas' five ways

he reveled that he's a fraud

there is no case

i was light blue

dying as a christian is depressing. death is like a full body amputation, you're gonna desperately want it back

press your tongue against the roof of your mouth, it's called mewing. that and hit the gym

more variation within than between is a super super common race denialist talking point that's been debunked about a 1000x now

there's more variation within humans and a particular subspecies of chimp than between them

it literally means nothing

we can feed a computer genetic data and tell it to sort it into a fixed number of groups, the sole criterion being to maximize genetic distance and it recreates the colloquial races

anyone who can look at a group of europeans and at a group of abos and tell you with a straight face that there's no meaningful distinction is a liar or a retard

it's like denying that the sky is blue

are you a liar or a retard? im gonna guess the former.

there are clearly differences between groups of people and they're significant enough to warrant a categorization scheme

@Yek there's a 30 point iq gap between jews and american blacks. these differences are significant

we're different in almost every conceivable way, skin color, the size of our brains, our average iqs, average heights, average number of sweat glands, etc etc

race denial is literally an insane position to hold

you are a crazy person

@Yek of course its justified, we categorize things based on much lesser differences. there are recognized subspecies of elk that you'd need a trained zoologist to discern between because the differences are so subtle. if you think the differences between chinese and europeans, or europeans and africans, or native americans and abos, arent enough to warrant race you have some sort of brain problem

im sorry, but this seriously is like looking up at the sky and saying its not blue

you sound insane

@Yek you have no science. i already explained why more variation within than between is a weak argument. this holds true for humans and a subspecies of chimp. do you think the human chimp distinction is meaningless?

also its not even really intuition

im observing real differences

@Yek you definitely can directly compare genetic variation in chimps and in humans, we can directly compare 99% of the two genomes. and there's more genetic variation within chimps and within humans than between them.

so clearly it means nothing as far as justifying whether or not to make a distinction between different races of people

more variation within than between just doesnt preclude the kinds of typological differences that would justify a racial categorization

there are different ways of measuring genetic variation. heterozygosity is a popular one. it's the probability that two random individuals in a population will differ in a gene at a random gene location

speaking properly is something jews do

low verbal iq gang

english has the most words of any language

and its grammar is way more complicated than spanish

complex, intricate, complicated, advanced, hard, difficult

there's like over a million words in english

there's gotta be a word for every possible thing you could imagine

what cant you imagine in physics

learning multiple languages is a waste of time

dont waste your brain space

simpler languages are superior. look at how fucked up chinese is

these asian kids would be gods if they werent being held back by that shitty language

a unique character for every word is one of the dumbest writing systems imaginable

esperanto would probably make a good language

not true

data types depend on your machine's word size

thats right, become catholic

what makes you say so

define racist

direct your minds to higher things ✝

look into aquinas' five ways

those are the best philosophical arguments for the existence of god

the arguments are strong, you probably havent interacted with the real ones

there are retarded bastardizations of them that are super prominent

there are supposedly good theoretical arguments for a multiverse. as for 3, you'd only find yourself in one of the universes that could support life

this is the anthropic principle

forget about fine tuning, thomism is where it's at

not everything needs a cause

the point is that just like there are many planets in the universe, there are many universes in the multiverse

there's a good recent qm book good for beginners

@Hector <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07FKQBD68>

it's a nice book, it's got a bunch of interactive html files

if you want good proofs for gods existence that cant be invalidated with physics, read ed feser's book "five proofs of the existence of god"

it's written for laymen

sorry duck but physics has to bend the knee to metaphysics

you havent interacted with the real ones, only caricatures

i would bet 1000 dollars you've only heard the strawman version of the argument from motion

no

noah's flood was a local flood that took place on the arabian peninsula about 13k years ago

@Hector that's right

neither of you understand the argument from motion cause it has nothing to do with the beginning of the universe

aquinas himself didnt think it was possible to prove by philosophical means that the universe began to exist. for the purposes of his argument it could be eternal

doesnt matter

when aquinas says motion he's talking about change in general

not only things changing position

you gotta read

theyve all stood unchallenged for 800 years

well except for the argument from motion, that ones stood for 2300 years

since aristotle

inertia isnt a valid counter argument

you're doing what young earth christian fundies do with evolution. "oh if evolution is true, why are there still monkeys"

the arguments are way more sophisticated then these caricature internet summaries present them as

no

it literally doesnt not say that

thats the caricature