Message from @Shekelstein

Discord ID: 637236807272235029


2019-10-24 10:20:28 UTC  

Fallacy.

2019-10-24 10:20:31 UTC  

Done.

2019-10-24 22:16:38 UTC  

ol skool

2019-10-24 22:23:33 UTC  

mushroom MUSHROOM

2019-10-24 22:23:37 UTC  

Newgrounds gang-gang

2019-10-25 08:25:53 UTC  

I can honestly see why God would save Catholics over Protestants

2019-10-25 09:47:46 UTC  

Not on their own, @The Eternal Swede , but if every conventional measure of normal evidence gets undermined by technology, they eventually CAN use that to argue the case for...say, state enforced DNA banks. Or tracking software.

2019-10-25 09:48:14 UTC  

They can use that to argue for those things already, as they know about the existence of deep fakes

2019-10-25 09:49:01 UTC  

Where the tech goes from here, publicity-wise, doesn't affect that very much

2019-10-25 09:49:19 UTC  

They can and will make whatever arguments they like, and if not these arguments, they will make other ones

2019-10-25 09:49:49 UTC  

I don't think the existence of deep fakes *meaningfully* affects their ability to create a deeper police state, is what I'm trying to say

2019-10-25 09:50:48 UTC  

We'll see if this won't be used past making porn video's about AOC

2019-10-25 09:50:50 UTC  

no such thing as state overreach

2019-10-25 09:50:55 UTC  

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

2019-10-25 09:52:19 UTC  

I don't have any numbers on it, but i'd be curious to know what are the predominant evidence methods currently used to convict criminals.

2019-10-25 10:00:55 UTC  

None of you believe there will be a transition period for stuff like this? People will be instantly redpilled? I dont buy it. Especially in Europe where people get convicted for tweets they cant even prove were written by them.

2019-10-25 10:28:53 UTC  

I bet the jews love this though, it means soon you can personify your stepmom pornhub fantasies

2019-10-25 10:29:11 UTC  

no people are selected by the redpill

and people like u and i will only propogate if the redpill selection machine helps with fertility and lifestyle

2019-10-25 10:31:30 UTC  

haha, soon™

2019-10-25 10:31:34 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/634548436280016906/637236806290505778/unknown.png

2019-10-25 13:05:41 UTC  

I am Muslim ama

2019-10-25 13:08:28 UTC  

When will you leave our countries

2019-10-25 13:09:46 UTC  

does your mother make good curry?

2019-10-25 13:09:50 UTC  

<:basedmama:396156349676781569>

2019-10-25 13:12:13 UTC  

Her mother is in the curry

2019-10-25 14:15:48 UTC  

Hey what’s up guys

2019-10-25 14:16:10 UTC  

I believe global warming is a real phenomenon

2019-10-25 14:16:12 UTC  

Debate me

2019-10-25 14:28:18 UTC  

Explain how historic levels of atmospheric CO2 did not contribute towards runaway warming. Then I might consider debating.

2019-10-25 14:29:04 UTC  

I'm specifically talking about periods in history when atmospheric CO2 was at levels ~1500ppm

2019-10-25 14:37:05 UTC  

@oojimaflip can you give me one instance of this? There are different reasons for different time periods.

2019-10-25 14:38:25 UTC  

Carboniferous period will do. As far as I can see the contention of climate scientists is that increased atmospheric CO2 will lead, via the greenhouse effect, to Earth becomming more like Venus.

2019-10-25 14:38:44 UTC  

if this were true, Earth would already look like Venus.

2019-10-25 14:39:50 UTC  

What was the carbon dioxide ppm at that time

2019-10-25 14:39:58 UTC  

~1500ppm

2019-10-25 14:40:56 UTC  

I mean Venus has an atmosphere of 96% carbon dioxide it says I’m not sure having a atmosphere of 1500 ppm would make it turn into Venus

2019-10-25 14:41:43 UTC  

not in terms of atmospheric compostition, no. But that's not the contention.

2019-10-25 14:42:01 UTC  

What

2019-10-25 14:42:30 UTC  

"atmospheric CO2 levels >400ppm (current) will lead to catastrophic temperature rise."

2019-10-25 14:42:52 UTC  

that's the contention, is it not?