Message from @Nerthulas

Discord ID: 638990081515978771


2019-10-30 06:37:09 UTC  

these guys are stamped off a factory or something

2019-10-30 06:37:11 UTC  

We've stacked up a mountain of evidence and he's brought faith-based arguments

2019-10-30 06:37:13 UTC  

I'm sorry, how do you know these genes have any causal relation to IQ?

2019-10-30 06:37:25 UTC  

i dont think so

2019-10-30 06:37:34 UTC  

@fuguer, just like I need to have complete sociological understanding before I reject twin studies?

2019-10-30 06:37:37 UTC  

so some unknown sociological effect causes twins raised in different environments to be 80% similar with respect to intelligence, and much more similar to each other in intelligence than people they were raised with and shared an environment with @BabygottBach ?

2019-10-30 06:37:37 UTC  

what a hypocrite you are

2019-10-30 06:37:47 UTC  

No you need to have any iota of proof

2019-10-30 06:37:49 UTC  

can you just tell me if that's your position?

2019-10-30 06:37:55 UTC  

Which uou have provided exactly none

2019-10-30 06:37:57 UTC  

No smart black population ever in the history of man, with a massive variance in enviroment

2019-10-30 06:38:03 UTC  

@Nerthulas, I've proven that there ARE sociological studies that show social effects for IQ.

2019-10-30 06:38:05 UTC  

@BabygottBach this one please

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/634367565304561675/638989990554238976/unknown.png

2019-10-30 06:38:08 UTC  

I'm just not familiar with them

2019-10-30 06:38:13 UTC  

You also aren't

2019-10-30 06:38:17 UTC  

if you're picking and choosing what scientific studies to accept and they happen to all align with your worldview, then you're not intellectually honest

2019-10-30 06:38:17 UTC  

No one here is

2019-10-30 06:38:23 UTC  

no I'm not talking about social causes of IQ

2019-10-30 06:38:25 UTC  

you're just like a climate denier

2019-10-30 06:38:26 UTC  

You equate an imcomplete understanding with a void understanding

2019-10-30 06:38:27 UTC  

please understand

2019-10-30 06:38:32 UTC  

@fuguer, have you read the sociological studies?

2019-10-30 06:38:42 UTC  

I'm asking you to explain the similarity of twins with respect to this

2019-10-30 06:38:45 UTC  

>these studies I never read say something that validates my worldview

2019-10-30 06:38:48 UTC  

No, you've come in to disprove and downgrade the heritability factor of IQ

2019-10-30 06:38:56 UTC  

That's what you came in with

2019-10-30 06:39:05 UTC  

I'm not asking you if sociological factors can influence IQ, please understand that @BabygottBach

2019-10-30 06:39:28 UTC  

@Nerthulas the study I linked is just such a study

2019-10-30 06:39:37 UTC  

I'm asking you if you think that sociological factors account for the 80% similarity between twins regardless of environment with respect to intelligence

2019-10-30 06:40:02 UTC  

I said I'm not asking you if sociological factors influence IQ

2019-10-30 06:40:02 UTC  

This study isclaiming hat position.

2019-10-30 06:40:12 UTC  

I know you did

2019-10-30 06:40:15 UTC  

no its not, it claims that they should be more cautious

2019-10-30 06:40:18 UTC  

lol

2019-10-30 06:40:31 UTC  

can you explain their mechanism?

2019-10-30 06:40:31 UTC  

It does more than that I'm afraid

2019-10-30 06:40:35 UTC  

their explanation of that?

2019-10-30 06:41:10 UTC  

"These findings should encourage caution among those who claim that the frequently trivial variance attributed to shared environments in behavioral genetic models means that families, schools, and neighborhoods do not meaningfully influence these outcomes."

2019-10-30 06:41:11 UTC  

Yeah there is a difference between a critique of the methodology behind twin studies and actually producing some empirical evidence that contradicts them lol

2019-10-30 06:41:16 UTC  

yes, they just encourage caution