Message from @fuguer
Discord ID: 638989756222406656
why are the twins more similar?
what genes?
LOL
Banjod posted about 600 of them I think
There may be a sociological effect that has not been accounted for
earlier
Twins raised apart being so much more similar to one another than another random set of people or the twin compared with another random sample from his own group utterly wrecks your entire position @BabygottBach
He did
what molecules do these genes code for, @Nerthulas ?
hahahah
and that sociological effect affects twins hundreds of miles apart to be similar @BabygottBach
?
how do these molecules interact with IQ?
see he used the kraut line
FIND THE GENES BIGOT
@Nerthulas, sure.
"There may be"
Don't humor him
we need to have complete molecular understanding of every gene expression before we can accept twin studies
He's being sarcastic i think
We've stacked up a mountain of evidence and he's brought faith-based arguments
I'm sorry, how do you know these genes have any causal relation to IQ?
i dont think so
@fuguer, just like I need to have complete sociological understanding before I reject twin studies?
so some unknown sociological effect causes twins raised in different environments to be 80% similar with respect to intelligence, and much more similar to each other in intelligence than people they were raised with and shared an environment with @BabygottBach ?
what a hypocrite you are
No you need to have any iota of proof
can you just tell me if that's your position?
Which uou have provided exactly none
No smart black population ever in the history of man, with a massive variance in enviroment
@Nerthulas, I've proven that there ARE sociological studies that show social effects for IQ.
@BabygottBach this one please
I'm just not familiar with them
You also aren't
if you're picking and choosing what scientific studies to accept and they happen to all align with your worldview, then you're not intellectually honest
No one here is
no I'm not talking about social causes of IQ
you're just like a climate denier
You equate an imcomplete understanding with a void understanding
please understand