<:LUL:404783252075970561>

Fine tunning

What fine tuning evidence is there that’s not addressed by multiverse?

Sure

@glamp I dispute the last premise. Why does it have to terminate in a mover which is purely actual?

If there are a million universes all with different fine tuning then obviously any sentient creature will find itself in the one universe that seems fine tuned for its existence. There’s no one alive in the other 99.9999% of universes the realize it’s not fine tuned

Now realize it’s not 1M it’s more like 10 to the 500 (string theory landscape)

@James Peterson because if it had any admixture of potentiality it would require actualization

How about the cosmological constant. Is it’s too fast, you can’t form planets. If it’s too slow, the universe collapses.

Also, I can reverse that argument. If I exist and God exist, I just need God to create one universe for me to exist, therefore I exist.

I used the same logic as Fuguer. I used a deduction.

Cosmological constant is addresses by multiverse comment I just made above

That doesn’t mean it came about naturally or by a personal mean.

the only thing more Talmudic and Rabbinical than a Rabbi is a Christian trying to pretend his beliefs are justified

In the 99.999999999% of universes where it’s not at a good value for life no one is alive to ask the question

<:athHM:647800394612998166>

a Jew would be hard pressed to keep up with the Talmudry of a Christian Apologist

You can only be alive to notice how finely tuned it is in a universe where it’s at a value required for life. It’s a tautology

Or you could just have one universe for life. I use a deduction as you do.

I am pro race mixing

Yes but a multiverse of randomly generated parameters explains all fine tuning arguments

And we see how the Higgs broke our symmetry in a random way so we’ve already seen it happen once

Wow that latest episode with the bond market guy was a damn train wreck

Just having one explanation doesn’t evoke me to accept your theory over mine.

And we know from inflation theory there is likely a vast landscape of universes where the Higgs collapses differently

good aftermorning m'goys

his theory is better

Good afternoon

due to Occams Razor

@iamwhoiam which goy?

no need to invoke additional complexity

The multiverse theory has more assumptions.

when you have an explanation without it

I make literally one assumption

Except we’ve already seen that multiverses exist

Double slit experiment

@fuguer have you been to another universe?

Higgs collapse

On my phone top three apps are as follows

Discord
Tinder
YouTube
Twitter
Pizza Hut

I haven’t gotten to that experiment yet.