Why would I want to debate some internet retard who thinks being a sede is smart

That it is not

That you take a writing

And transform it into ultramontanism

Why all the hostility

<:wojakbrainlet1:510858664534474752> this nigger in here like "dEbaTe mE"

We all gotta stop swearing and being so hostile?

@Wrath

Yeah stop

I f you can't control yourself

SHUT UP

Because sure, I say that this and that are retarded

Eat my ass

I assure you that the nonsense you say is as far of catholic teaching as you can be lmao, which is completely disconnected from the entire Church history

And is the cause of mass apostasy through memevacantes

Ngl I think Nihil is debating better and providing the evidence

What evidence?

Mozal is kinda like no you

ThatV1 says that the pope is authoritative when he is authoritative?

He says pretty much

"the Pope is authoritative when he talks about faith and morals"

Well, explain then, Vigilius

He at first rejected an ecumenical council

Said the content was heretical

Lmao no

I'm tlaking about Pope vigilius

Then ther is Peter

I still wonder about the point I presented, what made things infallible before V1, the response was that it was already intrinsically there but this roots back to the Peter issue, therefore if one goes by scrutinizing errors he will probably end the papacy at some time in the 1500’s

Lmao

He talked about faith

And morals

That is how you defined ex-cathedra

OF course it was a general statement

It concerned all gentiles

These excuses you make

With these sad redefitnitions of "excathedra"

Where you keep adding made up clauses

"well, but it doesn't count because you see, Peter had no internet and couldn't tweet his statements genrally"

1 timothy 2:12 @Pavel

**1 Timothy 2:12 - Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition (DRA)**

```Dust


<12> But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to use authority over the man: but to be in silence. ```

Not to mention Vigilius, who outright denied at first an entire ecumenical council