In their visions of what "the Church teaches"

The Church teaches the councils and what is said authoritatively lmao

I know that, which is why I have said that the Pope ultimately declares a council as ecumenical

This is some grade A autism lmao

A+

A×

Get in here if you want to debate

This perverse vision of the Pope, where he is this kind of constantly protected machine of Truth is a disaster. The Pope has certain privileges and such, he is not this retarded thing that people want to see where the authority of the Pope is mentioned

I’m in bed

Sorry

Maybe tomorrow though

No

It is not what the Church teaches

Why would I want to debate some internet retard who thinks being a sede is smart

That it is not

That you take a writing

And transform it into ultramontanism

Why all the hostility

<:wojakbrainlet1:510858664534474752> this nigger in here like "dEbaTe mE"

We all gotta stop swearing and being so hostile?

@Wrath

Yeah stop

I f you can't control yourself

SHUT UP

Because sure, I say that this and that are retarded

Eat my ass

I assure you that the nonsense you say is as far of catholic teaching as you can be lmao, which is completely disconnected from the entire Church history

And is the cause of mass apostasy through memevacantes

Ngl I think Nihil is debating better and providing the evidence

What evidence?

Mozal is kinda like no you

ThatV1 says that the pope is authoritative when he is authoritative?

He says pretty much

"the Pope is authoritative when he talks about faith and morals"

Well, explain then, Vigilius

He at first rejected an ecumenical council

Said the content was heretical

Lmao no

I'm tlaking about Pope vigilius

Then ther is Peter

I still wonder about the point I presented, what made things infallible before V1, the response was that it was already intrinsically there but this roots back to the Peter issue, therefore if one goes by scrutinizing errors he will probably end the papacy at some time in the 1500’s