Message from @Mozalbete ⳩
Discord ID: 603872688397877250
No
It is not what the Church teaches
Why would I want to debate some internet retard who thinks being a sede is smart
That it is not
That you take a writing
And transform it into ultramontanism
Why all the hostility
<:wojakbrainlet1:510858664534474752> this nigger in here like "dEbaTe mE"
We all gotta stop swearing and being so hostile?
Yeah stop
I f you can't control yourself
SHUT UP
Because sure, I say that this and that are retarded
Eat my ass
I assure you that the nonsense you say is as far of catholic teaching as you can be lmao, which is completely disconnected from the entire Church history
And is the cause of mass apostasy through memevacantes
Ngl I think Nihil is debating better and providing the evidence
What evidence?
Mozal is kinda like no you
He says pretty much
"the Pope is authoritative when he talks about faith and morals"
Well, explain then, Vigilius
He at first rejected an ecumenical council
Said the content was heretical
Lmao no
I'm tlaking about Pope vigilius
Then ther is Peter
I still wonder about the point I presented, what made things infallible before V1, the response was that it was already intrinsically there but this roots back to the Peter issue, therefore if one goes by scrutinizing errors he will probably end the papacy at some time in the 1500’s
Lmao
He talked about faith
And morals
That is how you defined ex-cathedra
OF course it was a general statement
It concerned all gentiles
These excuses you make
With these sad redefitnitions of "excathedra"
Where you keep adding made up clauses
"well, but it doesn't count because you see, Peter had no internet and couldn't tweet his statements genrally"
1 timothy 2:12 @Pavel