And a religion that alters their own documents to match new doctrines

They claim to believe the OT, but altered it

The Quran is a book, how it is a miracle?

The older manuscripts are all in favor of the Hebrew/Christian tradition. The Muslim manuscripts show absolutely clear alterations that are indisputably not from the original

Look I'm not trying to defend Islam I only said I am also interested in it

Why would anyone be interested in a blatant lie?

@Quarantine_Zone What specifically

We're just curious since you said "more convinced of Islam"

@Deleted User Ishmael replacing Isaac for instance

Lest I have been lied to by the Muslims I've talked to

Well for example how did Muhammad know the exact details of an embryo

What exact details?

3 protective layers of the initial cells, the days in which it forms certain organs, etc

Citation please. Then we'll assess

Okay I'll get it

Want to examine the primary text

Do you mean the same Muhammed who told us that every illness can be cured with dates and then died poisoned? The same one that tells us to dip flies that fall into our drink before one of the wings contain a disease and the other one the cure?

https://www.islam-guide.com/ch1-1-a.htm

I have a feeling this will end up being some vague writing or it will be easily showable by Arabic science at the time.

"We created man from an extract of clay. Then We made him as a drop in a place of settlement, firmly fixed. Then We made the drop into an alaqah (leech, suspended thing, and blood clot), then We made the alaqah into a mudghah (chewed substance)"

The same Muhammed that also says that the Sun sets in a muddy pool

Is this cringe fest the reason why someone should believe in Muhammed?

That article reeks of reading back into the text something that isn't there

I don't find that image in the Quran

People knew basic embryonic development

But it describes how an embryo appears

It wasn't known until 1800s

It describes with very vague language the development of a person in the womb

That was known science at the time...

It doesn't, it just describes "a drop", "a suspended thing", "a substance"

^

That is, generic fleshy growth

And a "blood clot" is **not** what an embryo is lol

If you want it to be scientific, then he got it wrong

I'm sure there is an equivalent of these in Christianity too, and every religion

They are wild straw-grasping

Seriously dude?

Are you also going to show us the WE WUZ pictures telling us how Beethoven was black?

This cant be seen by the eye