Message from @Quarantine_Zone

Discord ID: 547544163357425678


2019-02-19 22:20:47 UTC  

@Deleted User Ishmael replacing Isaac for instance

2019-02-19 22:21:09 UTC  

Lest I have been lied to by the Muslims I've talked to

2019-02-19 22:21:13 UTC  

Well for example how did Muhammad know the exact details of an embryo

2019-02-19 22:21:28 UTC  

What exact details?

2019-02-19 22:21:45 UTC  

3 protective layers of the initial cells, the days in which it forms certain organs, etc

2019-02-19 22:22:01 UTC  

Citation please. Then we'll assess

2019-02-19 22:22:09 UTC  

Okay I'll get it

2019-02-19 22:22:14 UTC  

Want to examine the primary text

2019-02-19 22:22:40 UTC  

Do you mean the same Muhammed who told us that every illness can be cured with dates and then died poisoned? The same one that tells us to dip flies that fall into our drink before one of the wings contain a disease and the other one the cure?

2019-02-19 22:22:54 UTC  

I have a feeling this will end up being some vague writing or it will be easily showable by Arabic science at the time.

2019-02-19 22:23:16 UTC  

"We created man from an extract of clay. Then We made him as a drop in a place of settlement, firmly fixed. Then We made the drop into an alaqah (leech, suspended thing, and blood clot), then We made the alaqah into a mudghah (chewed substance)"

2019-02-19 22:23:48 UTC  

The same Muhammed that also says that the Sun sets in a muddy pool

2019-02-19 22:23:58 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435520935647248414/547543900626092033/ch1-1-a-img2.jpg

2019-02-19 22:24:01 UTC  

Is this cringe fest the reason why someone should believe in Muhammed?

2019-02-19 22:24:09 UTC  

That article reeks of reading back into the text something that isn't there

2019-02-19 22:24:19 UTC  

I don't find that image in the Quran

2019-02-19 22:24:31 UTC  

People knew basic embryonic development

2019-02-19 22:24:34 UTC  

But it describes how an embryo appears

2019-02-19 22:24:52 UTC  

It wasn't known until 1800s

2019-02-19 22:25:01 UTC  

It describes with very vague language the development of a person in the womb

2019-02-19 22:25:09 UTC  

That was known science at the time...

2019-02-19 22:25:10 UTC  

It doesn't, it just describes "a drop", "a suspended thing", "a substance"

2019-02-19 22:25:17 UTC  

^

2019-02-19 22:25:32 UTC  

That is, generic fleshy growth

2019-02-19 22:25:55 UTC  

And a "blood clot" is **not** what an embryo is lol

2019-02-19 22:26:04 UTC  

If you want it to be scientific, then he got it wrong

2019-02-19 22:26:29 UTC  

I'm sure there is an equivalent of these in Christianity too, and every religion

2019-02-19 22:26:32 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435520935647248414/547544545752121395/ch1-1-a-img1.jpg

2019-02-19 22:26:34 UTC  

They are wild straw-grasping

2019-02-19 22:26:55 UTC  

Seriously dude?

2019-02-19 22:27:10 UTC  

Are you also going to show us the WE WUZ pictures telling us how Beethoven was black?

2019-02-19 22:27:42 UTC  

This cant be seen by the eye

2019-02-19 22:28:33 UTC  

"This can't be seen by the eye." You mean, "You have to read it in this specific way that doesn't match the actual text to understand it."

2019-02-19 22:28:40 UTC  

Thousands of years of prophecies and theology for this, people being "more convinced" by this cringe fest

2019-02-19 22:28:58 UTC  

How about when Muhammad told his followers they would one day conquer Constantinople and how the Rashidun won battles outnumbered by 200,000 +

2019-02-19 22:28:58 UTC  

Let me4 look for some picture that exemplifies how retarded this is

2019-02-19 22:29:14 UTC  

@Deleted User show source text again

2019-02-19 22:29:45 UTC  

Also, predicting you will take a country then it happening centuries later is far from prophecy

2019-02-19 22:30:06 UTC  

"hey dudes, if you follow me you will win battles"

2019-02-19 22:30:14 UTC  

Tells a lot about the purpose and legitimacy of a religion