Message from @Quarantine_Zone
Discord ID: 563508685775699968
Were talking about death counts as a result of bombing
The US military didn't care about anything beyond the equivalent to dying for Israel
We are talking about death toll
Which would lead to more deaths? Firebombing a bunch of cities, or destroying two?
Not doing anything leads to more deaths, since the population survivies and the deaths keep amassing
How do you not kill 7% of people right next to a nuclear bomb?
Firebombing a bunch of cities would have caused more deaths. You can go do the math
Orthobro, at 1000 ft, some may have survived if they were well sheltered somehow
I have to do econ and spanish homework.
I'm out.
GG's
Again, not doing anything causes more deaths because the high population keeps a periodical murder count
They just used whatever was more cruel and destructives
the japanese were the ones who cared about their poppulation and surrendered
It is clear that the Us ould have just killed the entire country to death. They just used whatever was more effective
The pic in question that urged this damage control
Luther here is playing the character of a Jew. He's speaking as if he is a Jew in that time accusing Jesus.
It's like quoting Luke 23:5 "He is causing riots by his teaching whereever he goes!" And then saying that Luke accused Jesus of causing riots
So, yes, it is taken out of context because Luther didn't say it as himself. He was impersonating an ancient Jew to show how they accused and thought of Jesus.
This is explained easily when you draw from the original source of the quote which is a 1536 sermon (WA 41, 647).
Lol how do I respond to that
What are some good books and articles on Legionarism?
For My Legionaries
lmao sauce on your profile picture?
is that an edit?
You talking to me?
yes.
No lol, that's from a real episode of Scooby Doo Mystery Incorporated
I remember that episode
I liked that bit the armour on the dudes looked cool
http://www.kolumbus.fi/aquilon/revolution.pdf Skip to page 29 and read this
@cqc there is no response. The fathers are in vast disagreement
There is no way to reconcile Jerome and Bede or Augustine and Chrysostom
Among many other conflicts
The three things on which the fathers agree universally are real presence, baptismal regeneration, and apostasy
And if you're honest with scriptures and don't try to shove it into a system, I believe you will indeed come to the same conclusions
Idk denom this guy is, but if he's Lutheran, then your only out is to debate Nicaea II
For Reformed, hit them with the above three things I mentioned
Same for Wesleyans, Remonstrants, and Anglicans