Not only that, you could potentially have cheap dry ice and (if this way is easier to get carbon with) carbon fiber

^

Pat Rick

Now we just need private businesses to build these. The cleaner builders sell the tech on the shelf ($), collection services to pickup the co2 containers when full and sell the co2 ($). Because we are stuck with a taxing government (for now) tax reductions or write offs for those who buy air co2 cleaners and have active pickup.

You will be stolen from (marginally) less

GG @T3CHN01200, you just advanced to level 1!

Yea

But still rather lose a dollar then 5 dollars.

If things purchased are 90+% tax, I see little difference

Although Nuclear power would still be a way better solution

But true

Cars though

All those coal rollers

Turbos and gas guzzlers

Yeah, but cutting down CO² output from other power sources gives us more time to make cars cleaner (Hydrogen Powered/ electric)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions_per_capita

I want to see hydrogen combustion. I've worked out solving most of the issues with hydrogen burn and I'm sure others can finish the rest. Such as hydrogen easily sparking ignition from lower temps. So A cylinder hot spot could set it off out of timing.

I wonder why this technology isn't taken more of a look at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_cell

Problem with feeding fuel is the injection. Will have to go back to using throttle body injection.

Efficient, cheap to refuel and the only thing coming out of the tail pipe is water

Those fuel cells were studied and prototypes made but they lack power and to make up for it, you have to increase weight beyond a gas engine. Nah direct hydrogen combustion it has to be for now.

You can always run it fuel rich, to limit dangers of accidental ignition

I don't really know much about engines tho, that might be very stupid lol

True but then gasoline becomes cheaper

And added fuel storage weight to get them equal milage

GG @THWARTED, you just advanced to level 3!

Which burns more

Really? We're talking about a small difference in mixture,right?

Cost ++++

Fuel cells are eneficient

Way too

You can get the same performance and mileage and a lot more on hydrogen on a throttle body injection

I really like HHO fuel

As you would on gasoline

Yeah HHO is great for rockets, but a bit to unstable for everyday uses isn't it?

No

It can be electrolyzed on site and stored as a reversible metal hydride

Fuel cells died out because they can't be used fast cars or big trucks. Only in those itty bitty smart car things that you could bench press

Tin and palladium being great examples

Of reversible metal hydrides

Although solar based ones are indeed nicer