Message from @THWARTED

Discord ID: 613080519558561803


2019-08-19 18:29:25 UTC  

Not only that, you could potentially have cheap dry ice and (if this way is easier to get carbon with) carbon fiber

2019-08-19 18:29:50 UTC  

^

2019-08-19 18:30:53 UTC  

Pat Rick

2019-08-19 18:33:34 UTC  

Now we just need private businesses to build these. The cleaner builders sell the tech on the shelf ($), collection services to pickup the co2 containers when full and sell the co2 ($). Because we are stuck with a taxing government (for now) tax reductions or write offs for those who buy air co2 cleaners and have active pickup.

2019-08-19 18:34:31 UTC  

You will be stolen from (marginally) less

2019-08-19 18:34:32 UTC  

GG @T3CHN01200, you just advanced to level 1!

2019-08-19 18:34:41 UTC  

Yea

2019-08-19 18:35:01 UTC  

But still rather lose a dollar then 5 dollars.

2019-08-19 18:35:09 UTC  

If things purchased are 90+% tax, I see little difference

2019-08-19 18:35:13 UTC  

Although Nuclear power would still be a way better solution

2019-08-19 18:35:14 UTC  

But true

2019-08-19 18:35:25 UTC  

Cars though

2019-08-19 18:36:06 UTC  

All those coal rollers

2019-08-19 18:36:27 UTC  

Turbos and gas guzzlers

2019-08-19 18:36:34 UTC  

Yeah, but cutting down CO² output from other power sources gives us more time to make cars cleaner (Hydrogen Powered/ electric)

2019-08-19 18:39:17 UTC  

I want to see hydrogen combustion. I've worked out solving most of the issues with hydrogen burn and I'm sure others can finish the rest. Such as hydrogen easily sparking ignition from lower temps. So A cylinder hot spot could set it off out of timing.

2019-08-19 18:40:29 UTC  

I wonder why this technology isn't taken more of a look at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_cell

2019-08-19 18:41:32 UTC  

Problem with feeding fuel is the injection. Will have to go back to using throttle body injection.

2019-08-19 18:41:41 UTC  

Efficient, cheap to refuel and the only thing coming out of the tail pipe is water

2019-08-19 18:43:06 UTC  

Those fuel cells were studied and prototypes made but they lack power and to make up for it, you have to increase weight beyond a gas engine. Nah direct hydrogen combustion it has to be for now.

2019-08-19 18:44:19 UTC  

You can always run it fuel rich, to limit dangers of accidental ignition

2019-08-19 18:44:46 UTC  

I don't really know much about engines tho, that might be very stupid lol

2019-08-19 18:44:48 UTC  

True but then gasoline becomes cheaper

2019-08-19 18:46:12 UTC  

And added fuel storage weight to get them equal milage

2019-08-19 18:46:12 UTC  

GG @THWARTED, you just advanced to level 3!

2019-08-19 18:46:21 UTC  

Which burns more

2019-08-19 18:46:29 UTC  

Really? We're talking about a small difference in mixture,right?

2019-08-19 18:46:33 UTC  

Cost ++++

2019-08-19 18:47:00 UTC  

Fuel cells are eneficient

2019-08-19 18:47:08 UTC  

Way too

2019-08-19 18:48:09 UTC  

You can get the same performance and mileage and a lot more on hydrogen on a throttle body injection

2019-08-19 18:48:26 UTC  

I really like HHO fuel

2019-08-19 18:48:27 UTC  

As you would on gasoline

2019-08-19 18:50:00 UTC  

Yeah HHO is great for rockets, but a bit to unstable for everyday uses isn't it?

2019-08-19 18:50:05 UTC  

No

2019-08-19 18:50:26 UTC  

It can be electrolyzed on site and stored as a reversible metal hydride

2019-08-19 18:50:37 UTC  

Fuel cells died out because they can't be used fast cars or big trucks. Only in those itty bitty smart car things that you could bench press

2019-08-19 18:50:41 UTC  

Tin and palladium being great examples

2019-08-19 18:50:53 UTC  

Of reversible metal hydrides

2019-08-19 18:51:02 UTC  

Although solar based ones are indeed nicer