Message from @IImploreYouToRemoveYourself
Discord ID: 591089451346821122
@DJ_Anuz
Tim has to win.
Idk Skyler Turden has some pretty rad tats @Mandatory Carry
@DJ_Anuz
This is a beanie battle, Tim has to win.
¿Tats? Tats are for pussies men get branded.
Say that reminds me... I should re-do my shoulders.
@Mandatory Carry some real "men" for ya. Maybe its just me but these brandings look disgusting
Love me some crispy vegetables.
@scaevola
*"@Mandatory Carry some real "men" for ya. Maybe its just me but these brandings look disgusting"*
Ya well branding animals is pret... Oh, wait, I was talking about MEN, not common pigs.
Based Norm!
Shut Up Jupiter!
Dont forget to paypal her guys
LIVE and Tonight We Snipe - #CogLive
Come and join the chat! (:
https://www.youtube.com/c/CognitiveThought/live
My newest video on Iran bombing on the US tanker ship. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zl4SsOGpA5Q
I find it funny when people on the left try and roll out the Kochs when criticising Trump
It's a leftover trick that they saved from right to work battles
When Act 10 went into place here in Wisconsin, it was "Koch Brothers" every 10 minutes on local news
check out Computing Forever Bitchute Exclusive! https://www.bitchute.com/video/J7cpC2di6Q1x/
I generally have some agreement with Tucker, but _man_ he has a raging hate boner for libertarianism. IMO, the problem with the Koch brothers is that they're globalists, not that they're libertarian. There are libertarians that don't have a problem with the idea of the country having better border security, or with the idea of the government encouraging (through a combination of tariffs and incentives) companies to create their products within the country (see, for example, Styx, who has expressed a positive sentiment towards both of these).
it's just a question of minimal government control where possible, and that "where possible" really depends on the person you're talking to, when it comes to libertarians
I also disagree with his take that a law that would cap drug prices in the US is a good thing, because if we implemented that as well, it would cause the pharmaceutical industry to just move over to China for its R&D instead, which would arguably be worse for us as a country than dealing with high drug prices (at least in my opinion)
Yeah. R&D for drugs can cost billions of dollars and then the drugs are sold to a small portion of the population. It’s the biggest reason why drugs are expensive
Anyone who understands basic high school economics could figure that out.
I personally think that a better use of government resources would be to figure out how to do gene therapy effectively
That way, many of these illnesses could be cured and it’s possible to prevent them from being passed on.
Well, high school economics aren't really taught in high school anymore.
@aguyyouknow I argue with libertarians often :)
True libertarians don’t exist. Lol
libertarians' greatest enemy is other libertarians...
Heh.
@Salacious Swanky Cat you can't cure the diseases. There's no profit in that. Everyone knows that the true path forward is keeping people sick and treating them for a half a century
while i staunchly disagree with doctor assisted suicide, that reasoning is also why that faces such a harsh opposition. The medical industry can mask it as "Life is Sacred" while ensuring that people who are terminally ill are kept alive as long as possible to keep the treatments going. I disagree with it on a moral level, as I would assume most people who you and I talk to as well. But if you think that the medical lobby is opposing it for moral reasons you're out of your mind