Circumcision for the Brazilians. Lol

^

Cut a part of it or cut it all off.

Lol

https://www.dawn.com/news/1478637

I’m glad I’m hoodless

Yeah me too and I don’t care. I think the controversy over circumcision is overblown.

.................

and so it begins

Naa, its fine if people think it wasn't a problem for them (that they know of).
It would just be great if people who "didn't care", then it shouldn't matter one way or the other, so how about going with the side that doesn't harm babies... Oh well.

Just dam https://twitter.com/nativeesoul/status/1121864781512740865?s=21

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/maine-renames-columbus-day-to-honor-native-americans/ar-BBWl5XB?OCID=ansmsnnews11

Why honor people who lost?

:)

Well they did give us lacrosse and dream catchers

@I Know a Fat Guy The dog should have driven.

I spent a lot of years thinking that buffalo were extinct.

They are, i killed them all in Red Dead 2.

b/c California can't fail fast enough...https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/26/us/california-restaurants-climate-change-surcharge-trnd/index.html

@I Know a Fat Guy#359 to be fair it’s optional. That doesn’t mean the money will actually be used sensibly though

it's a socialist non-profit. that means:
1. it's activist welfare
2. it's guaranteed to be a waste

btw, so-called "Fair Trade" is also activist welfare and keeps poor people in third world countries out of employment

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/27/opinion/sunday/socialism.html?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytopinion

This dude stupid he says "a little higher tax isn't socialism guys". People in the democratic party are advocating nationalizing entire industries. And claims Venezuela isn't real socialism (all the weren't real socialism). No they were, that's the point you can't get there without Authoritarianism and killing a bunch of people. and even then you won't get there.

"they resent her charisma"

uh... yeah

sure

charisma

something like that

I guess being decent looking and dumber than a box of rocks is charisma... somehow

(in regards to republican's feelings on AOC, to clarify the context)

She's full on advocating nationalizing healthcare, transportation and every building in America. She's socialist and says so

(this is literally what he says)

"And I am painfully aware that the male Fox commentariat nurtures its sickly obsession with Ms. Ocasio-Cortez partly because they resent her cleverness, charisma and moral vitality"

which is.... beyond moronic

she's not clever, she's not charismatic

I view publishing a guy like this similar to publishing a neo-nazi

and she's literally under investigation for several issues related to how her team handled their campaign money

and how they got it

I'd agree with that. And to be clear, I'm fine with that

I actually would WANT NYT to publish both, as long as they make it clear that it's an opinion piece