Doesn't sound like he tried to contact them in any way, and he was only giving obviously subjective opinions. Even with repeated action, I don't think someone should face legal prosecution for tweeting at someone calling them ugly several times

https://definitions.uslegal.com/h/harassment/

it also generally requires proving intent to harass and/or annoy

so yea i agree with you

According to the posters on my campus reminding everyone not to rape, it's repeated action that causes fear

it honestly sounds like a unelected police chief is gungho about authoritarian digital practices

Or maybe that's stalking, idk it's all bs

right

"Harassment is governed by state laws, which vary by state, but is generally defined as a course of conduct which annoys, threatens, intimidates, alarms, or puts a person in fear of their safety."

How does this make sense? https://columbiachronicle.com/editorial-young-people-need-spaces-and-understanding-not-policing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgiT9BxmPU8

https://www.foxnews.com/world/brazilian-president-says-government-must-work-with-men-to-reduce-high-numbers-of-penis-amputations

>Be Brazilian

>Don't know what soap is apparently

>Get so dirty your penis needs to get chopped off

The fuck?

People forget that Brazil is basically completely unindustrialized and 95% retarded

Circumcision for the Brazilians. Lol

^

Cut a part of it or cut it all off.

Lol

https://www.dawn.com/news/1478637

I’m glad I’m hoodless

Yeah me too and I don’t care. I think the controversy over circumcision is overblown.

.................

and so it begins

Naa, its fine if people think it wasn't a problem for them (that they know of).
It would just be great if people who "didn't care", then it shouldn't matter one way or the other, so how about going with the side that doesn't harm babies... Oh well.

Just dam https://twitter.com/nativeesoul/status/1121864781512740865?s=21

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/maine-renames-columbus-day-to-honor-native-americans/ar-BBWl5XB?OCID=ansmsnnews11

Why honor people who lost?

:)

Well they did give us lacrosse and dream catchers

@I Know a Fat Guy The dog should have driven.

I spent a lot of years thinking that buffalo were extinct.

They are, i killed them all in Red Dead 2.

b/c California can't fail fast enough...https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/26/us/california-restaurants-climate-change-surcharge-trnd/index.html

@I Know a Fat Guy#359 to be fair it’s optional. That doesn’t mean the money will actually be used sensibly though

it's a socialist non-profit. that means:
1. it's activist welfare
2. it's guaranteed to be a waste

btw, so-called "Fair Trade" is also activist welfare and keeps poor people in third world countries out of employment

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/27/opinion/sunday/socialism.html?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytopinion

This dude stupid he says "a little higher tax isn't socialism guys". People in the democratic party are advocating nationalizing entire industries. And claims Venezuela isn't real socialism (all the weren't real socialism). No they were, that's the point you can't get there without Authoritarianism and killing a bunch of people. and even then you won't get there.